It now seems that some of the the Minutemen coming to Houston might actually exercise their Second Amendment right to keep and bear arms. A number have concealed carry permits, and the local organizers will not forbid them to carry their weapons.
I'm not going to get into a discussion of the right to keep and bear arms. I won't discuss whether or not these folks should be carrying weapons when legally authorized to do so.
No, what I want to point out is this glaring lie from an HPD spokesman.
Houston police are aware that some of the Minutemen will be armed, and officers will make sure that all laws are obeyed, said Lt. Robert Manzo, an HPD spokesman.
Well, maybe just by the Minutemen. There will be no enforcement of our nation's immigration laws, nor laws against hiring immigration criminals. That means the border jumpers and those who aid and abet them will get a free pass -- as usual in this sanctuary city.
Trackback Information for Selective Law Enforcement
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://blog2.mu.nu/cgi/trackback.cgi/109552Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 'Selective Law Enforcement'.
» Safety For Dummies links with: HPD Will Enforce ALL Laws!, on August 20, 2005, 09:26 PM
Excerpt: I sincerely doubt the spokesman meant to be this unintentionally ironic. Greg at Rhymes with Right passes on this great post that I hope you all get a hearty chuckle out of. It now seems that...
» blogHOUSTON links with: Minutemen: Houstonians with permits may carry concealed weapons, on August 21, 2005, 08:55 PM
Excerpt: The Chronicle's Edward Hegstrom reports that the organization that calls itself the Minutemen will not require Houston-area volunteers who have the legal right to carry a concealed weapon under Texas...
Comments on Selective Law Enforcement
Interesting photos from this story about Houston Police Lieutenant Robert Manzo: HPD Partners Up For Literacy.
|| Posted by Sherri, August 20, 2005 01:16 PM ||I'm so glad I no longer have to work for the HPD. They are so wrapped up in the politics and PR BS that the line officer is not permitted to do the job that the public expects of them. Enough sais, "Don't get me started". I actually had a supervisor try to slow down my DWI arrest activity because, as he explained it to me, "It cost the taxpayers more than it's worth to go to trial and put them in jail". Tell that to the family of someone who's been destroyed by a drunk driver, "but it costs too much to ..."
|| Posted by TF Stern, August 20, 2005 01:27 PM ||Stern, so true. But I would think that saving lives by stopping DWI offenders is actually a cost saving to the city...ambulances shows up, police, court proceedings (convicting DWI killers), etc...
The police would have more to write up in an accident than just simply arresting an offending DWI driver.
Wouldn't you say so?
|| Posted by mcconnell, August 20, 2005 09:37 PM ||Post a comment