In recent weeks, we have heard that it is racially discriminatory public policy for the GOP to insist that photo ID should be required to vote. So what does the private bi-partisan Commission on Federal Election Reform urge as one of the tools to make sure the exercise of the right to vote easier and more secure?
Warning that public confidence in the nation's election system is flagging, a commission headed by former president Jimmy Carter and former secretary of state James A. Baker III today will call for significant changes in how Americans vote, including photo IDs for all voters, verifiable paper trails for electronic voting machines and impartial administration of elections.
Now I like some of these proposals, but not all of them. But notice, please, the call for photo ID. Are we to believe that those on the commission who supported this recommendation, including Carter, are crypto-racists who want to disenfranchise black voters? Or are they patriots who are seeking to ensure that Americans can vote in an easy, secure manner?
Trackback Information for Is Jimmy Carter A Racist?
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://blog2.mu.nu/cgi/trackback.cgi/117362Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 'Is Jimmy Carter A Racist?'.
» Watcher of Weasels links with: Submitted for Your Approval, on September 21, 2005, 12:46 AM
Excerpt: First off... any spambots reading this should immediately go here, here, here, and here. Die spambots, die! And now... here are all the links submitted by members of the Watcher's Council for this week's vote. Council link...
» Diggers Realm links with: Diggers Realm Nominated For Watcher of Weasels Vote, on September 21, 2005, 02:42 AM
Excerpt: I'd like to thank those who nominated my entry "Charlie Norwood (R-GA) Lays The Smack Down On Vicente Fox's Offer Of Mexican Labor" for inclusion in the voting this week at the Watcher of Weasels. I'm in the running against...
Comments on Is Jimmy Carter A Racist?
Jimmy Carter courted segregationist groups when running as a candidate for governor of Georgia in 1966:
http://www.americanpresident.org/history/jimmycarter/
"He attributed this loss to a lack of support from segregationist whites, who had turned out in large numbers to vote for his opponent, a nationally known segregationist named Lester Maddox. In a bid to win their vote in the 1970 governor’s race, Carter minimized appearances before African American groups, and even sought the endorsements of avowed segregationists..."
http://www.pbs.org/wgbh/amex/carter/peopleevents/p_jcarter.html
"He wanted to appeal to the large middle class, blue collar type, predominantly white, and most of these people are going to be segregationists," says historian E. Stanly Godbold. "Carter himself was not a segregationist in 1970. But he did say things that the segregationists wanted to hear."
After winning the election, he declared the era of segregation over. That said; I don't care - what he did is intellectually dishonest and is dancing with the devil to accomplish what you believe to be right. Sorry Charlie, but that's wrong no matter what you wish to accomplish.
...and the Democrats call Republicans racist. Try again. They're willing to say, do, or hurt anything to win the fight. They care about power, not what's right.
Bartleby
|| Posted by Bartleby, September 20, 2005 10:06 AM ||Sorry - that was completely off topic, but as far as I'm concerned, Carter *IS* a racist, because he's willing to use those views to advance his personal desires and beliefs.
Bartleby
|| Posted by Bartleby, September 20, 2005 10:07 AM ||Um.....
It seems he thinks that Georgia's laws are potentially discriminatoy & above that he was hesitant to suggest it.
http://www.washingtonpost.com/wp-dyn/content/article/2005/09/19/AR2005091901162.html
Carter, who chaired an election reform commission along with former Secretary of State James Baker, said in Washington Monday that requiring photo IDs was one of the most important and most difficult of his group's recommendations.
"We addressed this with a great deal of hesitancy," he said, adding that a national approach would prevent states from enacting laws that are discriminatory.
|| Posted by jp, September 20, 2005 05:37 PM ||If Designer replica handbags are indeniably the most popular choice of modern women, other leading brands continuously experience huge demand. Also, our Louis Vuitton Handbags,
|| Posted by replica handbags, August 22, 2009 09:06 PM ||associating sophistication and tradition, attract the eye of tasteful
women... Also, to satisfy the tastes of each woman, we carry a very
wide range of replica handbags, including copies of bags by Chanel handbags, Fendi handbags, Mulberry handbags,Marc Jacobs handbags,Gucci handbags,Yves Saint Laurent handbags, Balanciaga handbags, Miu Miu handbags, Thomas Wylde handbags, Mulberry handbags, Prada handbags ,Coach handbags,and Hermes handbags...We are continually updating and adding more and more products from famous brand such as LV,Marc Jacobs handbags , Gucci,Dior, Chanel,Chloe handbags,Fendi, Balenciaga ,Coach handbags and more!Such as,all Fendi handbags of the materials are exactly the same as the genuine and all the products are produced with elaborate technique. . . All Miu Miu handbags also come with a dust cover, certificate of authenticity card and care booklet
Replica Watch:Replica Watch
|| Posted by replica watches, August 24, 2009 01:03 AM ||Replica Watches:Replica Watches
Replica Breitling Watches:Replica Breitling Watches
Replica handbags:Replica handbags
Fake watches:Fake watches
Louis Vuitton handbags:Louis Vuitton handbags
Gucci handbags:Gucci handbags
chanel handbags:chanel handbags
Marc Jacobs handbags :Marc Jacobs handbags
Fake designer handbags:Fake designer handbags
Post a comment