Well, Patrick Fitzgerald indicted Scooter Libby today.
Vice President Cheney's chief of staff, I. Lewis "Scooter" Libby, was indicted today by a federal grand jury after a nearly two-year investigation into the leak of a CIA agent's identity.Capping a week of political turmoil in Washington, Libby promptly resigned and left the White House. He expressed confidence that eventually he would be "totally exonerated," and both Cheney and President Bush praised his talent and dedication. "Obviously, today is a sad day for me and my family," Libby said in a statement.
***
Libby, 55, was indicted on charges of perjury, obstruction of justice and making false statements. The five-count indictment charges that he lied to FBI agents and to the federal grand jury about how and when he learned classified information about the employment of a CIA agent, Valerie Plame, and disclosed that information to three journalists. If convicted on all counts, Libby faces up to 30 years in prison and a $1.25 million fine.
What today's indictment of Scooter Libby seems to establish is the following.
1) The so-called "outing" of Valerie Plame broke no law -- most likely because the individuals involved did not know that she was operating under cover.
2) The problem with special prosecutors is that they are like a knight-errant roaming to countryside looking for a worng to right. The result is that they find it necessary to bring some sort of charge to justify their investigation. There has to be a better way.
3) Laws on perjury and false statements need to be made much more clear, so that a mere error does not become the basis of criminal charges.
4) When summoned to testify before a grand jury, take the Fifth. When invited to talk to investigators, refuse. The exercise of one's constitutional right to avoid making incriminating statements is perfectly legitimate when your words are going to be combed over looking for the slightest inconsistency, no matter how unintended.
But let me state this for the record -- if it can be shown that Libby or anyone else intentionally lied to or misled investigators, the full sanction of the law should fall on them. Too bad that the Democrats don't support this principle when the liar is one of their own.
Trackback Information for Less Than Meets The Eye
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://blog2.mu.nu/cgi/trackback.cgi/124956Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 'Less Than Meets The Eye'.
» The Colossus of Rhodey links with: Indictment, on October 29, 2005, 07:36 AM
Excerpt: The "big guns" have the news and the good links: Michelle Malkin; Generation Why; Glenn Reynolds; Capt. Ed; Cliff May: "... the accusation was that this was done as a way to punish punish Joe Wilson and to send a...
Comments on Less Than Meets The Eye
Post a comment