Rhymes With Right - Anti-Lifers Seek To Stifle Pro-Life Speech
Google
 
Web rhymeswithright.mu.nu

January 14, 2006

Anti-Lifers Seek To Stifle Pro-Life Speech

I guess that the ersatz "right to an abortion" along with the non-existant "right not to be offended" trump the Constitutional right to engage in speech on matters of public policy and concern.

Or at least that is the goal of San Francisco abortion advocates, who are seeking to limit supporters of the dignity of human life to nothing more than "the right to remain silent".

Bay Area abortion-rights activists say a Roman Catholic group's advertisements on hundreds of BART trains and in scores of stations -- attacking the Supreme Court's Roe vs. Wade decision and asking "Abortion: Have we gone too far?" -- have gone too far in a region known for its progressive politics.

Many of the ads have been torn down or defaced since the campaign began three weeks ago.

"I think every woman has noticed them,'' said Suzanne "Sam" Joi, a member of Code Pink, a social justice and anti-war group. "I couldn't believe BART would allow something like this. Why are they doing this?''

Well, you ignorant baby-killing leftist, it could be because the First Amendment applies to words and viewpoints that don't meet with your approval. If you have a right to run ads advocating your pro-terrorist, anti-American agenda, then the Respect Life Ministry of the Diocese of Oakland can run its ads questioning whether the current state of the law on abortion is outside of the mainstream.

Linton Johnson, a spokesperson for BART, puts it very well.

"We're not in the business of censorship and don't believe a government agency should be in the business of censorship,'' Johnson said. "It shouldn't be up to a government official to determine whose opinion is right and whose is wrong.''

What is so offensive about the ads? Are they offensive at all? You decide.

The campaign features two ads, each slickly produced and featuring a blurry photograph of a woman against a turquoise background. One ad, headlined "9 months" in large letters, features nine months of a calendar and reads: "Because of Roe vs. Wade, this is the amount of time the Supreme Court says it's legal to have an abortion."

The other contains the message: "The Supreme Court says you can choose: after the heart starts beating, after its arms and legs appear, after all organs are present, after the sex is apparent, after it sucks its thumb, after it responds to sounds, after it could survive outside the womb.''

Both ads conclude with the tagline "Abortion: Have we gone too far?'' and the name and Web site address (www.secondlookproject.org) for the Second Look Project, an effort sponsored by the U.S. Conference of Catholic Bishops, which created the campaign and unveiled it on Washington's Metro subway system a year ago.

In other words, we are not talking about pictures of dismembered fetuses here. We are talking about very mild political speech.

The rhgetoric of opponents is shrill, heated, and hysterical.

Abortion-rights activists are responding differently, calling the ads misleading, manipulative and part of an effort to undermine the pro-choice movement in the Bay Area.

"They're calling for the overturn of Roe vs. Wade, which will lead to the slaughter of women,'' said Elizabeth Creely of the Bay Area Coalition for Our Reproductive Rights, referring to fears of unsafe, back-alley abortions if the procedure were illegal. "The Catholic Church is very strong here and is working hard to erode reproductive rights.''

Actually, it will lead to states and Congress to pass laws regulating or restricting abortion, but likely not outlawing it in most places. And as far as the "slaughter of women" you are bleating about, Ms. Creely, the number will be quite small compared to the number of babies slaughtered annually in the name of "choice".

But thank you for clarifying matters for us, ladies -- you want a right explicitly protected by the Constitution to be sacrificed in the name of one that was alien to that document before a group of rogue judges created it in 1973.

MORE AT: Blogs for Bush, Phoblographer, Intergalactic Jester, GeMatt's Place, Paul's Word, W.C. Varones Blog, Cvstos Fidei, Vern Beachy's Raves, Say Anything, Right Side Redux, Beachhouse, Beetle Beat.





|| Greg, 03:51 PM || Permalink || Comments (4) || Comments || TrackBacks (0) ||

Trackback Information for Anti-Lifers Seek To Stifle Pro-Life Speech

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://blog2.mu.nu/cgi/trackback.cgi/145602
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 'Anti-Lifers Seek To Stifle Pro-Life Speech'.

Comments on Anti-Lifers Seek To Stifle Pro-Life Speech

Stifle? Please! Is it not free speech to show objection to the ads? :)

you ignorant baby-killing leftist

Very strong words here. Thing is, it's not quite a baby. That is where the disagreement lays. As far as ignorant. I would take a look at the spelling of your comments on my site vs oh say, mine on yours. :)

Just saying.

|| Posted by Angie, January 15, 2006 05:02 AM ||

When you destroy, deface, and attempt to use government to prevent speech by your opponents, you have gone well-beyond legitimate free speech. You have intruded into censorship -- unless you wish to also classify bombs and bullets as free speech as well, in which case maybe we on the prolife side should begin to celebrate rather than condemn that misguided handful of souls who blow up abortion clinics and murder abortionists.

And as for you "not quite a baby" comment, that is about as accurate as the Klan and the Nazis telling you that blacks and Jews are not quite human beings. Human parents, 52 chromosomes, distict genetic identity -- what additional claim do YOU have on humanity, Angie?

As for my spelling. . . there is a reason I teach history and not keyboarding.

|| Posted by Rhymes With Right, January 15, 2006 07:57 AM ||

Rhymes With Right,

You're right on with this one. My colleague at The Inter-Galactic Jester brought this to our attention as well and the big question for those of us not in San Franciso, the big question was, "Is this the same sort of outrageous blood-spattered photographs that we've seen from Pro-Lifers before?" Having made clear that they weren't, their vandalism is disgraceful.

If it was those awful photos, they really wouldn't seem to be be appropriate for a public subway and BART would be irresponsible for posting them.

|| Posted by Croaky, January 15, 2006 04:55 PM ||

Croaky -- I don't know that I agree with you that there would have been anything wrong with using pictures that show the real face of "choice", or that BART would have been justified in censoring them if they were.

That said, the fact that we are talking a really low-key ad campaign makes the anti-freedom antics of the anti-life censors even more outrageous.

|| Posted by Rhymes With Right, January 15, 2006 05:47 PM ||
Post a comment

Remember personal info?


 

 





AnotherMunublogSmall.jpg





Winner - 2010 Fabulous 50 Blog Awards

Posts by Category

Announcements (posts: 13)
Blogging (posts: 154)
Border Issues & Immigration (posts: 368)
deferred (posts: 4)
Education (posts: 583)
Entertainment & Sports (posts: 405)
History (posts: 301)
Humor (posts: 71)
Israel/Middle East (posts: 13)
Medical News (posts: 51)
Military (posts: 253)
News (posts: 1409)
Paid Advertising (posts: 138)
Personal (posts: 87)
Politics (posts: 3920)
Race & Racism (posts: 188)
Religion (posts: 702)
Terrorism (posts: 793)
The Courts (posts: 278)
Watcher's Council (posts: 318)
World Affairs (posts: 308)

Archives

November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
December 0000



MuNuviana



Licensing

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Powered By

Powered by
Movable Type 2.64
AnotherMunublogSmall.jpg

Administrative Stuff

Email Me
Syndicate this site (XML)

Advertising Disclosure

adpolicy.gif

About Me

NAME: Greg
AGE: 40-Something
SEX: Male
MARITAL STATUS: Married
OCCUPATION: Social Studies Teacher
LOCATION: Seabrook, TX
DISCLAIMER: All posts reflect my views alone, and not the view of my wife, my dogs, my employer, or anyone else. All comments reflect the view of the commenter, and permitting a comment to remain on this site in no way indicates my support for the ideas expressed in the comment.

Search This Site


Support This Site



Recent Entries

But Do Originalism And Support For Amendment The Constitution Really Contradict?
Student Scolded For Tweet About Governor
Happy Thanksgiving 2011
Best Thanksgving Television Clip Ever
Human Rights Atrocities Constitute Obama Policy Success
Redefining "Victim"
The Definitive #OWS Photo
RIP Anne McCaffrey -- Science Fiction/Fantasy World Loses A Giant
The #Occupy Poster Child
Why The #OWS Movement Won't Work

Blogroll


Watchers Council
  • Bookroom Room
  • The Colossus of Rhodey
  • The Glittering Eye
  • GrEaT sAtAn"S gIrLfRiEnD
  • JoshuaPundit
  • The Mellow Jihadi
  • New Zeal
  • The Noisy Room
  • The Political Commentator
  • The Razor
  • Rhymes With Right
  • The Right Planet
  • Right Truth
  • Simply Jews
  • Virginia Right!
  • Watcher Of Weasels

  • Political & Religious Blogs