Rhymes With Right - Feingold Calls For Censure
Google
 
Web rhymeswithright.mu.nu

March 12, 2006

Feingold Calls For Censure

Sen. Russ Feingrold -- who helped John McCain rape the First Amendment -- is now seeking to make an end-run around the Constitution again.

Congress should censure President George W. Bush for ordering domestic eavesdropping on U.S. citizens without a warrant, a Democratic senator said on Sunday.

Sen. Russ Feingold of Wisconsin told ABC's "This Week" that he intends to push for a resolution that would censure the president for what he considers an unlawful wiretapping program authorized by the White House after the September 11 attacks.

Now there is no provision for the censure of the President in the Constitution, so I would hope that any attempt would be ruled out of order.

On what basis does Feingold want there to be a censure?

"The president has broken the law and, in some way, he must be held accountable," Sen. Russ Feingold, D-Wis., told The Associated Press in an interview.

* * *

The five-page resolution to be introduced on Monday contends that Bush violated the law when, on his own, he set up the eavesdropping program within the National Security Agency in the months following the attacks of Sept. 11, 2001.

Bush claims that his authority as commander in chief as well as a September 2001 congressional authorization to use force in the fight against terrorism gave him the power to authorize the surveillance.

The White House had no immediate response on Sunday.

The resolution says the president "repeatedly misled the public" before the disclosure of the NSA program last December when he indicated the administration was relying on court orders to wiretap terror suspects inside the U.S.

"Congress has to reassert our system of government, and the cleanest and the most efficient way to do that is to censure the president," Feingold said. "And, hopefully, he will acknowledge that he did something wrong."

The Wisconsin Democrat, considered a presidential contender for 2008, said he had not discussed censure with other senators but that, based on criticism leveled at Bush by both Democrats and Republicans, the resolution makes sense.

The president's action were "in the strike zone" in terms of being an impeachable offense, Feingold said. The senator questioned whether impeaching Bush and removing him from office would be good for the country.

Russ, if you really believe that there is something impeachable here, censure is unacceptable (it is cowardly, in addition to being extra-constitutional). Why don't you just sign on with the House Moonbat Caucus and led your prestige to this proposal.

30 US House Representatives have signed on as sponsors or co-sponsors of H. Res 635, which would create a Select Committee to look into the grounds for recommending President Bush’s impeachment, Atlanta Progressive News has learned.

“There has been massive support for House Resolution 635 from a very vigorous network of grassroots activists and people committed to holding the Bush Administration accountable for its widespread abuses of power,†US Rep. John Conyers (D-MI) said in a statement prepared for Atlanta Progressive News.

* * *

Over 14% of US House Democrats now support the impeachment probe; almost 7% of all US House Representatives now support the probe. In December 2005, there were 231 Republicans in the US House, 202 Democrats, 1 Independent, and 1 vacancy, a clerk for the US House of Representatives told Atlanta Progressive News.

The best represented states on H. Res 635 are California (7), New York (6), Massachusetts (3), Georgia (2), Minnesota (2), and Wisconsin (2).

The current 30 total co-sponsors are Rep. Neil Abercrombie (D-HI), Rep. Tammy Baldwin (D-WI), Rep. Michael Capuano (D-MA), Rep. Lois Capps (D-CA), Rep. William Lacy Clay (D-MO), Rep. John Conyers (D-MI), Rep. Sam Farr (D-CA), Rep. Maurice Hinchey (D-NY), Rep. Mike Honda (D-CA), Rep. Sheila Jackson-Lee (D-TX), Rep. Barbara Lee (D-CA), Rep. John Lewis (D-GA), Rep. Carolyn Maloney (D-NY), Rep. Jim McDermott (D-WA), Rep. Cynthia McKinney (D-GA), Rep. Gwen Moore (D-WI), Rep. Jerrold Nadler (D-NY), Rep. James Oberstar (D-MN), Rep. John Olver (D-MA), Rep. Major Owens (D-NY), Rep. Donald Payne (D-NJ), Rep. Charles Rangel (D-NY), Rep. Martin Sabo (D-MN), Rep. Bernie Sanders (I-VT), Rep. Jan Schakowsky (D-IL), Rep. Fortney Pete Stark (D-CA), Rep. John Tierney (D-MA), Rep. Nydia Velazquez (D-NY), Rep. Maxine Waters (D-CA), and Rep. Lynn Woolsey (D-CA).

Wouldn't you be in fine company, Russ -- and it would really help you to get the support of the far-left moonbat wing of the Democrat Party -- the KOSsaks and DUmmies and all the rest of the extreme Lleft who haven't met an enemy of the United States tehy haven't embraced.

So have the courage of your convictions Russ -- and stand by the Constitution, if you really believe the President has committed High Crimes and Misdemenaors.

Or is this all a publicity stunt, designed to make you look good but accomplish nothing?

MORE AT: Decision '08, Political Pitbull, Blogs for Bush (twice), Sister Toldjah, Those Bastards!





|| Greg, 02:51 PM || Permalink || Comments (10) || Comments || TrackBacks (0) ||

Trackback Information for Feingold Calls For Censure

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://blog2.mu.nu/cgi/trackback.cgi/156337
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 'Feingold Calls For Censure'.

Comments on Feingold Calls For Censure

Sen. Russ Feingrold...is now seeking to make an end-run around the Constitution again...Now there is no provision for the censure of the President in the Constitution, so I would hope that any attempt would be ruled out of order.

Uh, dude, the Senate can pass any non-binding resolution it wants, per the Constitution. Note the Constitution says nothing about the rules of the Senate, except that the Senate can make up its rules of operation. Do you think the Senate rules are "out of order"?

So have the courage of your convictions Russ -- and stand by the Constitution, if you really believe the President has committed High Crimes and Misdemenaors.

Feingold is in the Senate, which does not have the power to file Articles of Impeachment. This is his only avenue to register his concerns over Bush's trampling the Constitution until the House sends over Articles.

Really, you might want to think about what the Constitution actually means before you go off half-cocked...

|| Posted by NTodd, March 12, 2006 03:40 PM ||

Todd -- I'm arguing that any attempt to "censure" the president is out of line Constitutionally. The Constitution dictates what should be done in the case of alleged law-breaking and constitution-violating by the President -- it is impeachment. To fail to follow the Constitution in such a case is coawrdice and a violation of the Constitution -- the exact same standard I held to during the Clinton impeachment, when some suggested a censure of the First Horndog.

And by the way -- I recognize that the Senate cannot introduce articles of impeachment -- but I'm suggesting that he come out and lend his support to the efforts of the House Moonbat Caucus. You know -- take a stand for the Constitutional process -- if he actually believes his own words.

|| Posted by Rhymes With Right, March 12, 2006 04:07 PM ||

I'm arguing that any attempt to "censure" the president is out of line Constitutionally.

And you are wrong in that. Censure is merely a resolution expressing the Senate's opinion on the President's behavior. They can do that, per the Constitution. It isn't legislation any more than the Senate's Rules.

And Feingold should most assuredly NOT stick his nose in the House's business. The legislature is bicameral for a reason, and the chambers stay out of each other's way because of tradition and Constitutional delimiting of powers.

You're barking up the wrong tree.

|| Posted by NTodd, March 12, 2006 04:10 PM ||

And let's try this one again -- Feingold has stated that there has been an impeachable offense committed.

If such is the case (and I do not believe it to be the case), the appropriate response is for the House to impeach the President and the Senate to convict.

Oh, and by the way -- if Feingold lending support to a move for impeachment is "sticking his nose into the House's business" (something that he, as an American citizen, has every right to do), then how much more would a censure be a case of "sticking [the Senate's] nose into the House's business" by offering its opinion on presidential lawbreaking?

|| Posted by Rhymes With Right, March 12, 2006 04:38 PM ||

If such is the case (and I do not believe it to be the case), the appropriate response is for the House to impeach the President and the Senate to convict.

How binary. Should all Americans remain silent on Impeachment until the House votes on Articles? Of course not. Same goes for the Senate--it has every right to express its sense of what is going on in the nation.

Censure is Constitutional. It's a resolution expressing the Senate's opinion on Bush's actions. It is not a call for Impeachment and is not outside the Senate's demesne.

Oh, and by the way -- if Feingold lending support to a move for impeachment is "sticking his nose into the House's business" (something that he, as an American citizen, has every right to do), then how much more would a censure be a case of "sticking [the Senate's] nose into the House's business" by offering its opinion on presidential lawbreaking?

The Senate is merely making a statement on its opinion of the lawbreaking. It is not necessarily weighing in on Impeachment.

Censure is a legitimate action by the Senate. It does not Impeach the President or remove him from power, nor does it have any weight of law. Your argument from a Constitutional perspective is poppycock.

|| Posted by NTodd, March 12, 2006 06:34 PM ||

Ah, but if they are taking a position on the lawbreaking, are tehy not implicitly taking a position on impeachment? Heck, are they not pre-judging any impeachment case that comes before them?

|| Posted by Rhymes With Right, March 12, 2006 07:07 PM ||

¥»¥Ã¥¯¥¹¥»¥Õ¥ì¥¢¥À¥ë¥È¥¨¥íSEXÉ÷¯¥ª¥Ê¥Ë¡¼½Ð²ñ¤¤¥¨¥í¥»¥Ã¥¯¥¹¥»¥Õ¥ì¥¨¥Ã¥Á½Ð²ñ¤¤½Ð²ñ¤¤¥»¥Ã¥¯¥¹Áǿͥ¨¥Ã¥ÁµðÆý½Ï½÷½Ï½÷SEX½Ï½÷

|| Posted by ²È½Ð¾¯½÷, January 29, 2009 11:01 PM ||

ƒpƒ“ƒXƒgˆ¤lƒGƒƒAƒjƒ‚Ü‚ñ‚±ˆ¤l•åWƒRƒ“ƒp•s—Ïo‰ï‚¢lÈo‰ï‚¢n—o‰ï‚¢‚Û‚Á‚¿‚á‚èo‰ï‚¢SMo‰ï‚¢ŠØ‘lo‰ï‚¢’†‚”No‰ï‚¢’†‘lo‰ï‚¢ƒtƒBƒŠƒsƒ“lo‰ï‚¢

|| Posted by , January 30, 2009 10:00 PM ||

— ƒrƒfƒI—öƒZƒŒƒu‚¨‚Á‚Ï‚¢ƒIƒbƒpƒCŽèƒRƒL“ŽBƒƒŠ[ƒ^‰‡•ŒðÛ‰Æo­—‰ÆoŒfަ””ޗ”ÞŽ‡ƒRƒ“ƒeƒŒƒNƒ‰‰œ—l‚²‹ßŠ—ŽqZ¶—Žq‘å¶’†Šw¶­—’†o‚µ•½¬¶‚܂ꕂ‹C

|| Posted by o‰ï‚¢, January 30, 2009 10:14 PM ||

ƒƒ‹—FƒŒƒCƒvƒƒŠ—Žq‚¶”š“û–³C³—Œð—öˆ¤ƒ\[ƒvƒ‰ƒ“ƒhƒfƒŠƒoƒŠ[ƒwƒ‹ƒXƒf[ƒgƒiƒ“ƒp‹ße‘ŠŠ­ƒtƒFƒ‰ƒ`ƒIƒtƒFƒ‰‹t‰‡•‹t‰‡”ü“ûŒ‹¥ˆ—ƒ‰ƒCƒuƒ`ƒƒƒbƒgo’£ƒzƒXƒgoˆ§‚¢o‰ï‚¢ŒnƒTƒCƒgo‰ï‚¢U—ª‰ï‚¦‚éƒTƒCƒg‚¨‹à–Ⴄ‚¨¬Œ­‚¢‰Ò‚¬•—‘­ìƒLƒƒƒoì’j‚𔃂¤

|| Posted by •—‘­, January 30, 2009 10:42 PM ||
Post a comment

Remember personal info?


 

 





AnotherMunublogSmall.jpg




Posts by Category

Announcements (posts: 13)
Blogging (posts: 139)
Border Issues & Immigration (posts: 262)
deferred (posts: 3)
Education (posts: 472)
Entertainment & Sports (posts: 328)
History (posts: 258)
Humor (posts: 52)
Medical News (posts: 49)
Military (posts: 218)
News (posts: 1205)
Paid Advertising (posts: 491)
Personal (posts: 67)
Politics (posts: 2826)
Race & Racism (posts: 132)
Religion (posts: 574)
Terrorism (posts: 652)
The Courts (posts: 239)
Watcher's Council (posts: 215)
World Affairs (posts: 263)

Archives

December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
December 0000



MuNuviana


Warning: include() [function.include]: URL file-access is disabled in the server configuration in /home/grega/public_html/archives/162916.php on line 548

Warning: include(http://munuviana.mu.nu/archives/nu.inc) [function.include]: failed to open stream: no suitable wrapper could be found in /home/grega/public_html/archives/162916.php on line 548

Warning: include() [function.include]: Failed opening 'http://munuviana.mu.nu/archives/nu.inc' for inclusion (include_path='.:/usr/lib/php:/usr/local/lib/php') in /home/grega/public_html/archives/162916.php on line 548

GOP Bloggers Blogroll


Live Liberty And Property Blogroll

Anti-PC League

Licensing

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Powered By

Powered by
Movable Type 2.64
AnotherMunublogSmall.jpg

Administrative Stuff

Email Me
Syndicate this site (XML)

Advertising Disclosure

adpolicy.gif

About Me

NAME: Greg
AGE: 40-Something
SEX: Male
MARITAL STATUS: Married
OCCUPATION: Social Studies Teacher
LOCATION: Seabrook, TX
DISCLAIMER: All posts reflect my views alone, and not the view of my wife, my dog, my employer, or anyone else. All comments reflect the view of the commenter, and permitting a comment to remain on this site in no way indicates my support for the ideas expressed in the comment.

Search This Site


Support This Site



The Blogospheric Ecosystem


Words of Wisdom


Recent Entries

Why Wasn’t Schumer Arrested?
Bravo, Kay
Health Care Trumps National Security
The Liberal Double Standard On Religion
Another One Bites The Dust
Is Barack Obama A Ninth Grader?
Words I Cannot Believe I Saw In Print
I Just Can’t Believe This Crap
But Isn’t This Just Affirmative Action?
A Tip Of The Hat To Stephen King

Recent Comments

•—‘­ said:

ƒƒ‹—FRead more in Feingold Calls For Censure
o‰ï‚¢ said:

— ƒrƒfƒIRead more in Feingold Calls For Censure
said:

ƒpƒ“ƒXƒgRead more in Feingold Calls For Censure
²È½Ð¾¯½÷ said:

¥»¥Ã¥¯¥¹Read more in Feingold Calls For Censure
Rhymes With Right said:

Ah, but if they are taking a position on the lawbreaking, are tehy not implicitly taking a positi Read more in Feingold Calls For Censure
NTodd said:

If such is the case (and I do not believe it to be the case), the appropriate response is for Read more in Feingold Calls For Censure
Rhymes With Right said:

And let's try this one again -- Feingold has stated that there has been an impeachable offense co Read more in Feingold Calls For Censure
NTodd said:

I'm arguing that any attempt to "censure" the president is out of line Constitutionally. Read more in Feingold Calls For Censure
Rhymes With Right said:

Todd -- I'm arguing that any attempt to "censure" the president is out of line Constitutionally. Read more in Feingold Calls For Censure
NTodd said:

Sen. Russ Feingrold...is now seeking to make an end-run around the Constitution again...Now th Read more in Feingold Calls For Censure



Blogroll


Watchers Council

Political & Religious Blogs
RepublicanAttackSquad.gif


<a href="http://www.bloginspace.com/" target="_blank"><img src="http://www.bloginspace.com/_assets/img/badges/bloginspace_145x100.gif" width="145" height="100" border="0" alt="BlogInSpace.com"></a> Listed on BlogShares

Counters and Stuff

Total Entries: 9253
Total Comments: 500895
Comments/Entry: 54.13


Acceptance Mark