Mailed-By: aol.com
To: rhymeswithright@gmail.com
Date: May 22, 2006 4:50 PM
Subject: Hey!
Please disable all of my contact links on the Ashley Reeves blog.
Thanks,
-Kim
From: Greg Mailed-By: gmail.com
To: "Lycansshadow@aol.com"
Date: May 22, 2006 11:11 PM
Subject: Re: Hey!
You are in no position to make such a demand -- and I don't have the time to do so. You put them there, you will have to live with them.
From: Lycansshadow@aol.com Mailed-By: aol.com
To: rhymeswithright@gmail.com
Date: May 22, 2006 11:19 PM
Subject: Re: Hey!
Dude, what's your problem? I didn't do anything to you. I don't know if you're embarrassed that you were bested by someone so young, or just jealous that someone so young has that ability, and I don't particularly care. Bottom line is I made a polite request that you disable links so that complete strangers would quit telling me how great, or not great, I am. I know it wouldn't take long, so quit with the"I don't have time" thing.
Do it, don't do it, whatever. It's just e-mails, either way. But I suggest you learn the difference between a request and a demand, and quit taking your dissatisfaction with life out on me.
From: Greg Mailed-By: gmail.com
To: "Lycansshadow@aol.com"
Date: May 22, 2006 11:43 PM
Subject: Re: Hey!
GET LOST.
And by the way -- you were requested to make no more contact with me. You violated that. I will be forwarding your emails to AOL and Yahoo, requesting that they terminate your accounts.
Regards,
Greg
From: Lycansshadow@aol.com Mailed-By: aol.com
To: rhymeswithright@gmail.com
Date: May 22, 2006 11:46 PM
Subject: Re: Hey!
Could you be more of an Idiot? Like AOL is really going to lose 30 bucks a month because some balding, middle-aged nobody can't handle a kid hitting a little too close to the mark. R-ight...
From: Greg Mailed-By: gmail.com
To: abuse@yahoo.com, abuse@aol.com
Cc: barelymuggle2@yahoo.com, lycansshadow@aol.com
Date: May 22, 2006 11:55 PM
Subject: Fwd: Hey!
On May 14, at 3:37 PM, this individual was requested to cease all contact with me. She has not. Please take appropriate action to terminate her account for violation of terms of service.
From: Greg Mailed-By: gmail.com
To: abuse@aol.com, abuse@yahoo.com
Cc: barelymuggle2@yahoo.com, lycansshadow@aol.com
Date: May 22, 2006 11:57 PM
Subject: Fwd: Hey!
On May 14, at 3:37 PM, this individual was requested to cease all contact with me. She has not. Please take appropriate action to terminate her account for violation of terms of service.
From: Lycansshadow@aol.com Mailed-By: aol.com
To: rhymeswithright@gmail.com
Date: May 23, 2006 12:00 AM
Subject: Re: Hey!
Like I said Could you be more of an idiot? What does that prove other than you enjoy wasting time typing things noone will probably ever read and if they do, won't care about. Geez, man, get a life, and quit e-mailing me, you perv.
From: Greg Mailed-By: gmail.com
To: abuse@aol.com, abuse@yahoo.com
Cc: barelymuggle2@yahoo.com, lycansshadow@aol.com
Date: May 23, 2006 12:05 AM
Subject: Fwd: Hey!
On May 14, at 3:37 PM, this individual was requested to cease all contact with me. She has not. Please take appropriate action to terminate her account for violation of terms of service.
From: Lycansshadow@aol.com Mailed-By: aol.com
To: rhymeswithright@gmail.com
Date: May 23, 2006 12:08 AM
Subject: Re: Hey!
I would quit e-mailing me if I were you. I'm about to tag you as a sexual predator. (who else e-mails teens girls in the middle of the night? Sicko).
From: Greg Mailed-By: gmail.com
To: abuse@aol.com, abuse@yahoo.com
Date: May 23, 2006 12:09 AM
Subject: Fwd: Hey!
On May 14, at 3:37 PM, this individual was requested to cease all contact with me. She has not. Please take appropriate action to terminate her account for violation of terms of service.
Trackback Information for Arrogant Child Threatens False Accusation
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://blog2.mu.nu/cgi/trackback.cgi/169207Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 'Arrogant Child Threatens False Accusation'.
Comments on Arrogant Child Threatens False Accusation
Good job on posting up the e-mail. Were some of your "responses" fabricated, all of them, or what?
I have to say "thanks" at least to you for defending my comment in a previous thread (read: flame war). I was quickly jumped on for being a friend of Kim or being Kim herself.
The only thing I agreed with Kim on, was that it should be questioned why such a young girl was with an older guy. Or should I put it the other way around? What was an older guy doing with a high school girl? Defaming her by labeling the girl as a pregnant teen was overboard, so much that the mother had to defend her against the media.
Back to this e-mail debacle. Kim has no reason, nor obligation (besides personal respect) to cease e-mailing you. That's easily fixed with spam-filtering or a blocked e-mail. She *did* make a polite initial request (assuming all of the correspondence above is legitimate) which in no way seemed like a "demand."
I don't think she's in any position to be reported to AOL for abuse, as she wasn't abusing anything. She finally grasped for some form of defense by threatening to label you as a "sicko", after you supposedly e-mailed abuse@aol.com.
You put up with enough crap from teens at school, I'm sure, so I'd recommend just blocking the girl, and leaving her comments up.
You've already wasted enough time as it with her. (On a side note, any chance of allowing my blog, http://www.smarterspam[dot]com/wordpress/ to not get picked up by the spam filter for "spam[dot]com" ?)
|| Posted by Eric Clemmons, May 23, 2006 09:13 AM ||A couple of issues here.
1) I've tried to block her, but cannot get that done without blocking all of AOL. She was requested not to post here, and continued to do so -- and she was requested not to contact me in the future after her abusive comments here. I merely followed up on my previous promises of action -- and she became progressively more abusive as she found she would not get her way. Quite frankly, I believe she displayed her true character with the threat she made -- and anyway, if I'm a perve for sending her a courtesy copy of my emails to her ISP, then she would have to be a slutty little twit (should that be an "a" instead of an "i"?) who is pursuing an older man who doesn't want to be bothered.
2) All emails are legitimate -- I'll forward them all to you if you want confirmation of that fact. I'm rather offended by your questioning their validity. After all, cut-and-paste isn't that hard.
3) As for your blog, I've forwarded the request on to the fellow who runs all the mu.nu blogs. For whatever reason, nothing has happened to fix the situation.
|| Posted by Rhymes With Right, May 23, 2006 03:57 PM ||Whoa whoa, buddy! Take it easy :) I'm on your side! And yes, it's "twat", not "twit." It's a common mistake.
I believe you in that they were valid, it's just that the statement:
|| Posted by Eric Clemmons, May 23, 2006 07:45 PM ||"now she wants to spread lies about me for daring to report her for being an abusive annoyance" threw me off on whether she fabricated some of the e-mails to make you seem more corrosive.
Post a comment