Rhymes With Right - But Why Are We Taking Such Extreme Precautions?
Google
 
Web rhymeswithright.mu.nu

August 19, 2006

But Why Are We Taking Such Extreme Precautions?

After all, these are OLD chemical weapons -- weapons dating back to the Cold War and therefore clearly old enough that they must be degraded beyond use and not a threat to anyone.

The Army has begun draining and incinerating thousands of containers of mustard gas held in storage at a facility in the Utah desert.

The project at the Deseret Chemical Depot, begun Friday, will last six to 10 years. It involves burning about 6,200 tons of liquid blister agent and is complicated by the presence of an estimated 800 pounds of toxic mercury.

At one time, the depot housed more chemical weapons than any other U.S. storage site. To comply with the international Chemical Weapons Convention, the U.S. government began weapons destruction there in 1996.

The destruction of the mustard gas is the final phase in the project.

Mustard gas, which is a liquid at room temperature, causes severe blisters, internal and external bleeding, and strips mucous membranes from airways.

Workers will first drain and incinerate the 1-ton mustard gas containers, depot spokeswoman Alaine Southworth said. They will also design and install filters to scrub mercury from the exhaust, she said.

So would someone explain to me why American chemical weapons must be disposed of so carefully? Are these some sort of super-weapons that contain speacial chemicals not bound by the same laws of physics that operate in Iraq? Is this program simply a government boodoggle, putting an expensive piece of pork in someone's home state?

Or is it perhaps teh case that these weapons are still dangerous WMDs -- and that the ones found in Iraq are ALSO live, dangerous WMDs that prove that Saddam Hussein was not in compliance with his UN obligations?





|| Greg, 06:45 PM || Permalink || Comments (4) || Comments || TrackBacks (0) ||

Trackback Information for But Why Are We Taking Such Extreme Precautions?

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://blog2.mu.nu/cgi/trackback.cgi/182790
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 'But Why Are We Taking Such Extreme Precautions?'.

Comments on But Why Are We Taking Such Extreme Precautions?

Scott Ritter and Hans Blix have already outlined that he was in compliance. Further, Bush's policy was a done deal as the Downing Street Memo shows.afterdowningstreet.org


Ray McGovern embarrassed Rumsfeld (the Olmert of the US,perhaps even by the siteowner's lights) a couple months ago, quoting a Rummy pre-war assurance at a public confrontation as to where a large number of WMDs would be found and what they were. None were. These liars expected a quick easy win and a public which didn't care if WMDs were found,as long as big bad (and 9/11 complicit) Saddam was overthrown.


Empty chairs at the Hague?

|| Posted by Ken Hoop, August 20, 2006 12:48 PM ||

But how can that be -- either the weapons were non-operational or they weren't.  And if they were inert, so are these and we can just dispose of them in Ken's local garbage dump because they are safe.

|| Posted by Rhymes With Right, August 20, 2006 02:10 PM ||

These weapons are being destroyed because they are old and obsolete. The destruction facility is operated under stringent safety and security requirements in accordance to Department of Defense requirements, the National Environmental Policy Act and the Resource Conservation and Recovery Act environmental permit. Oversight for the permit falls under the Utah Department of Environmental Quality http://www.hazardouswaste.utah.gov/HWBranch/CDSection/ChemicalDemilSection.htm. In addition, the United States is required to destroy its chemical stockpile under the provisions of the Chemical Weapons Convention treaty (see www.opcw.org). For more information, please see below.

M. Morales


FACILITY TO LAUNCH LAST MAJOR
CHEMICAL DESTRUCTION CAMPAIGN

DESERET CHEMICAL DEPOT, STOCKTON, Utah -- The first mustard agent-filled munition punched and drained today signaled the beginning of the last major destruction campaign at the U.S. Army's Tooele Chemical Agent Disposal Facility at Deseret Chemical Depot (DCD).
There are nearly 6,194 tons of mustard agent stored mostly in bulk containers at the remote depot located 60 miles southwest of Salt Lake City, a percentage of which are known to contain trace amounts of mercury.
Sampling operations currently underway are characterizing the content of individual bulk containers (each containing approximately 1,800 pounds of chemical agent) to identify those with little to no mercury. Initial processing will begin with containers that have low mercury and low heel (thickened sludge and sediment) content.
During this first year and a half, workers will design and install special filters for the furnace pollution abatement systems. The addition of these sulfur-impregnated carbon filters will remove mercury from exhaust gases generated when containers determined to contain elevated concentrations of mercury are processed at a later date.
This is the largest chemical agent destruction campaign that the Army will undertake to eliminate aging stockpiles and meet the nation's commitment under the global Chemical Weapons Convention. The event coincides with the 10th anniversary of the start of operations at the facility.
"Our workforce is proud to be a part of this legacy," said Col. Frederick Pellissier, DCD commander, ”and we are committed to working towards creating a safer tomorrow for this great nation.”
Ted Ryba, TOCDF Site Project Manager added, “We have already safely eliminated 7,409 tons of chemical agent and more than one million munitions, reducing the risk to the community and the environment by more than 99 percent."
"We are privileged to be part of our nation’s initiatives to eliminate chemical weapons world wide,” said Gary McCloskey, EG&G Defense Materials Vice President and Technical Director. “We will not only be destroying the largest single agent stockpile in the United States, but will set operational precedents and providing lessons learned necessary to simplify the mustard destruction planning process for others"
-30-

The U.S. Army Chemical Materials Agency (CMA) with headquarters at Aberdeen Proving Ground, Md., stores the nation's aging chemical weapons and develops programs aimed at effectively treating and ultimately eliminating chemical warfare materiel. For more information about CMA and its programs, visit www.cma.army.mil.

|| Posted by M. Morales, August 21, 2006 12:03 PM ||

So let's clarify -- they are not WMDs and considered safe when they are found in Iraq, but dangerous and in need of special handling in the USA.  I wonder how that can be -- must be special rules of chemical and physics.

|| Posted by Rhymes With Right, August 21, 2006 01:46 PM ||
Post a comment

Remember personal info?


 

 





AnotherMunublogSmall.jpg





Winner - 2010 Fabulous 50 Blog Awards

Posts by Category

Announcements (posts: 13)
Blogging (posts: 155)
Border Issues & Immigration (posts: 371)
deferred (posts: 4)
Education (posts: 586)
Entertainment & Sports (posts: 416)
History (posts: 302)
Humor (posts: 72)
Israel/Middle East (posts: 13)
Medical News (posts: 51)
Military (posts: 256)
News (posts: 1417)
Paid Advertising (posts: 138)
Personal (posts: 90)
Politics (posts: 4021)
Race & Racism (posts: 190)
Religion (posts: 709)
Terrorism (posts: 795)
The Courts (posts: 278)
Watcher's Council (posts: 327)
World Affairs (posts: 309)

Archives

January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
December 0000



MuNuviana



Licensing

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Powered By

Powered by
Movable Type 2.64
AnotherMunublogSmall.jpg

Administrative Stuff

Email Me
Syndicate this site (XML)

Advertising Disclosure

adpolicy.gif

About Me

NAME: Greg
AGE: 40-Something
SEX: Male
MARITAL STATUS: Married
OCCUPATION: Social Studies Teacher
LOCATION: Seabrook, TX
DISCLAIMER: All posts reflect my views alone, and not the view of my wife, my dogs, my employer, or anyone else. All comments reflect the view of the commenter, and permitting a comment to remain on this site in no way indicates my support for the ideas expressed in the comment.

Search This Site


Support This Site



Recent Entries

Theres A Beautiful Story In Here
Can A Late Entering Candidate Win The Nomination?
Why Chris Christie Resonates With People
Why Jeb Bush Remains Above The Fray
Racist Hispanic Group Attacks Sen. Marco Rubio
Im Really Tired Of Stories Like This
Support These Companies
A Reminder About The #Occupy Movement
Watcher's Council Results
A Picture Worth A Thousand Words?

Blogroll


Watchers Council
  • Bookroom Room
  • The Colossus of Rhodey
  • The Glittering Eye
  • GrEaT sAtAn"S gIrLfRiEnD
  • JoshuaPundit
  • The Mellow Jihadi
  • New Zeal
  • The Noisy Room
  • The Political Commentator
  • The Razor
  • Rhymes With Right
  • The Right Planet
  • Right Truth
  • Simply Jews
  • Virginia Right!
  • Watcher Of Weasels

  • Political & Religious Blogs