Google
 
Web rhymeswithright.mu.nu

September 12, 2006

Scuzzy Democrat's Lying Attack Must Be Rejected

After all, the statement is a flat-out lie, and everyone knows it. And for all her spinning, Claire McCaskill's lie cannot be justified in any context. Will Missouri Democrats reject it? Will national Democrats do so?

The U.S. Senate campaign of Missouri Democrat Claire McCaskill has been under sharp criticism since she accused President Bush of letting poor blacks in Louisiana die during Hurricane Katrina.

Mrs. McCaskill, the state auditor, is attempting to link Republican Sen. Jim Talent with the president as she tries to unseat the incumbent.

"George Bush let people die on rooftops in New Orleans because they were poor and because they were black," she told a group of Democratic state legislators last week.

The comments, made as she outlined Mr. Talent's efforts to attract minority voters, were first reported by Pub Def Weekly, a St. Louis-based blog.

McCaskill refuses to repudiate or apologize for this blood libel.

The record is clear that the state and local officials failed in their emergency planning and their obligation to safeguard their citizens -- but their party wishes to absolve them and play the race and poverty cards to smear their political opponents. Have the Democrats even one ounce of shame left?





|| Greg, 04:20 AM || Permalink || Comments (22) || Comments || TrackBacks (0) ||

Trackback Information for Scuzzy Democrat's Lying Attack Must Be Rejected

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://blog2.mu.nu/cgi/trackback.cgi/185754
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 'Scuzzy Democrat's Lying Attack Must Be Rejected'.

Comments on Scuzzy Democrat's Lying Attack Must Be Rejected

This Missouri democrat won't be rejecting it, and laughs at a
republican effort to hide behind the race and poverty card.  After
Bush and the republicans have cynically engaged in class warfare for 6
years (remember linking the minimum wage to the estate tax???), it's
wonderful to see a solid, former prosecutor like McCaskill stand up
against pampered coward like Jim Talent. 



She could have pulled her punches and said things a little nicer, and
maybe she should have.  But it's worth it to watch you and the
other whiny rightwingers yipe like puppies who have been swatted with a
newspaper. 



Whatever state and local failures may have occurred (and they were
mostly exaggerated or misunderstood), the fact remains that Bush
wouldn't interrupt his vacation when a major American city was
destroyed, and he had installed a horse lawyer to be in charge. 
Horrible malfeasance. 

|| Posted by Dan, September 12, 2006 05:21 AM ||

Guess you liked the Kool-Aid, Dan.  After all, her words are a flat-out lie, but you defend them as "standing up". 

Your respect for her "standing up" is no different than the respect Monica showed when Bill Clinton "stood up" for her.  Hope you have some good knee-pads.

|| Posted by Rhymes With Right, September 12, 2006 09:57 AM ||

Do you honestly believe that if the Superdome had been full of underfed republicans, the airspace would not have been jampacked with relief helicopters, even if they were rented (at profiteering rates) from Halliburton?

|| Posted by Dan, September 12, 2006 10:19 AM ||

If the New Orleans (and Louisiana as a whole) had been full of Republicans, there would not have been the sort of crisis that took place due to the incompetence and corruption of state and local officials.

Your question itself shows that McCaskill's blood libel of George W. Bush is indefensible, for you cannot muster a single piece of evidence that
"George Bush let people die on rooftops in New Orleans because they were poor and because they were black."  If there was such evidence, you would point to it.  Instead you trot out your moonbat talking points -- playing the race, poverty, and (now) Haliburton cards to cover the fact that McCaskill is a scuzz-bucket who is willing to sink to the most vile of levels in pursuit of victory.

|| Posted by Rhymes With Right, September 12, 2006 11:37 AM ||

Monies apportioned to strengthen the NO levee system were redirected to the Iraq War. Bush is to blame for putting America Last and the Big Oil/Israel special interests first. Not to guarantee local Louisiana politicos would have spent the money appropriately of course.


 

|| Posted by Ken Hoop, September 12, 2006 01:48 PM ||

Money which, you may not be aware, would not have even been spent by the time of Katrina -- after nearly a decade of malign neglect by the Clinton Administration and documented state and local corruption.

But then again, if Blanco and Nagin had just ordered those school buses to roll....

|| Posted by Rhymes With Right, September 12, 2006 06:55 PM ||

hah- you're hilarious when you're full of it. What, the fact that Bush let over a thousand people die in New Orleans isn't enough for you? You'll only settle for an autographed letter from Bush stating that he didn't really bother to interrupt his guitar-playing vacation BECAUSE he didn't really care about poor black people near as much as he does about rich white people. Okay, I guess you win, then. He didn't send such a letter. He just let them die.

|| Posted by Dan, September 12, 2006 09:00 PM ||

Then what of the inaction of Nagin and Blanco -- did they also "just let them die"?

Oh, and do you realize that the President has access to communication equipment that would allow him to direct efforts from anyplace in the freakin' country (or anywhere in the world), even if he isn't at the White House? He could and did oversee the federal effort in New Orleans -- which was, as I recall, dealt with more quickly than Hurricane Hugo during the Clinton Administration.

Your argument that Bush "let them die" "because he didn't really care about poor black people nearly as much as he does about rich white people" is utterly lacking in suppoting evidence and is every bit as much a blood libel as the claims of the "race ho" your party is running for Senate in the state of Misery (which I was glad to leave after one year of being forced to live there).

And frankly, it makes you no better than Ken Hoop and his anti-Semitic rantings.

Oh, by the way -- if you want to deal with malfeasance, what about a certain Demcorat president during the 1990s who would not interrupt a golf game to authorize a mission to get Osama bin Laden? I guess he didn't care about American people as much as he did about terrorist people -- and "making it to the hole" (on the course or in the Oval Office).

|| Posted by Rhymes With Right, September 13, 2006 08:53 AM ||

Care to back that up with a credible source?

|| Posted by Dan, September 13, 2006 09:08 AM ||

Might I offer two sources on Clinton's failures?
http://www.amazon.com/Dereliction-Duty-Eyewitness-Endangered-Long-Term/dp/0895261405/sr=8-1/qid=1158163373/ref=pd_bbs_1/104-2762292-2559124?ie=UTF8&s=books
http://www.amazon.com/Losing-Bin-Laden-Clintons-Unleashed/dp/0895260743

The first contains the story I slightly garbled -- Clinton was watching golf, not playing, when he delayed calling Sandy Berger for an hour when bin Laden could have been neutralized.

|| Posted by Rhymes With Right, September 13, 2006 10:06 AM ||

Umm, yeah. There's a lot of that book that comes out garbled. It's an insane hatchet job I read with amazement - it doesn't even bother to be consistent.

That said, I'm not arguing that hindsight doesn't show places I wish both Bush and Clinton had done more.

|| Posted by Dan, September 13, 2006 10:34 AM ||

So you are Swift-Boating an American veteran -- how dare you question his patriotism by accusing him of lying about his service!

Now i will agree with you that there were a number of things that should have been done differently -- dating back at least to the Reagan Administration, where the response to terrorism should have been different. It would have included the ruthless slaughter of every member of proto-Hezbollah after the attacks on the Marine Barracks and Embassy in Beirut -- and probably should have included a similar policy regarding the PLO after the Khartoum Embassy crisis during the Nixon Administration.

And it certainly should have included unconditional support for the Shah of Iran during the Carter Mal-Administration -- or at least the carpet-bombing of Iran after hostages were taken in 1979.

Oderint Dum Metuint

|| Posted by Rhymes With Right, September 13, 2006 11:03 AM ||

Sure, whatever you say. I'm just glad that you and those like you will never have power. Bush is bad enough.

BTW, it's funny how you think we can win against terror through fear. I understand that Republicans are cowards, but the rest of the world tends to be a little more brave. What makes you think that suicide bombers are going to be frightened away from their plans? Do you think the IRA stopped its bombing because of fear?

|| Posted by Dan, September 13, 2006 12:39 PM ||

"the ruthless slaughter of every Hezbollah" ?

More arrogant hubris. Reagan was a dolt for sending in the Marines to run interference for Israel and did the belatedly wise thing when he
quickly removed them with a fraction of the losses he would have incurred. Ask the quagmired
US forces who have just lost Anbar Province again,along with 2800 lives and myriad healthy bodies.

|| Posted by Ken Hoop, September 13, 2006 01:06 PM ||

After the next terrorist attack in this country, the policy I propose will be implemented.  The only question is whether it will be the official policy of our government -- or the terms under which Democrats surrender our nation to the jihadis.

I can already hear various leading Democrats -- "I, for one, welcome our new Muslim overlords!"

|| Posted by Rhymes With Right, September 13, 2006 03:00 PM ||

Ken -- you think any solution that does not maximize the number of dead Jews is unacceptably pro-Israel.

|| Posted by Rhymes With Right, September 13, 2006 03:01 PM ||

http://mundi-club.blogspot.com/2006/09/america-implementing-jewish-foreign.html


you're happy with Israeli-control over policy and care less about the Gentiles who die trying to carry it out.

|| Posted by Ken Hoop, September 17, 2006 08:38 PM ||

Ah, yes, Ken -- blame it on the JOOOOOOOOOOOOS!!!!!!!!!!!!

|| Posted by Rhymes With Right, September 17, 2006 09:07 PM ||

Hello!

|| Posted by canadian_viagra, April 21, 2016 10:25 AM ||

Hello!

|| Posted by side, July 7, 2016 04:59 AM ||

Hello!

|| Posted by buy_cialis, July 9, 2016 01:45 AM ||

Hello!

|| Posted by fast, July 9, 2016 01:49 AM ||
Post a comment

Remember personal info?


 

 





AnotherMunublogSmall.jpg





Winner - 2014 Fabulous 50 Blog Awards
Winner - 2014 Fabulous 50 Blog Awards

Winner - 2013 Fabulous 50 Blog Awards

Winner - 2012 Fabulous 50 Blog Awards

Winner - 2011 Fabulous 50 Blog Awards

Winner - 2010 Fabulous 50 Blog Awards

Winner - 2009 Fabulous 50 Blog Awards

Posts by Category

Abortion (posts: 1)
Announcements (posts: 13)
Blogging (posts: 187)
Border Issues & Immigration (posts: 421)
deferred (posts: 4)
Education (posts: 685)
Entertainment & Sports (posts: 483)
Guns & Gun Control (posts: 65)
History (posts: 329)
Humor (posts: 88)
Israel/Middle East (posts: 44)
Medical News (posts: 54)
Military (posts: 273)
News (posts: 1570)
Paid Advertising (posts: 234)
Personal (posts: 108)
Politics (posts: 5265)
Race & Racism (posts: 281)
Religion (posts: 819)
Terrorism (posts: 884)
Texas GOP Platform Reform Project (posts: 4)
The Courts (posts: 310)
Watcher's Council (posts: 482)
World Affairs (posts: 345)

Archives

February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
December 0000



MuNuviana



Licensing

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Powered By

Powered by
Movable Type 2.64
AnotherMunublogSmall.jpg

Administrative Stuff

Email Me
Syndicate this site (XML)

Advertising Disclosure

adpolicy.gif

About Me

NAME: Greg
AGE: 50-ish
SEX: Male
MARITAL STATUS: Married
OCCUPATION: Social Studies Teacher
LOCATION: Seabrook, TX
DISCLAIMER: All posts reflect my views alone, and not the view of my wife, my dogs, my employer, or anyone else. All comments reflect the view of the commenter, and permitting a comment to remain on this site in no way indicates my support for the ideas expressed in the comment.

Search This Site


Support This Site



Recent Entries

Resolution Packet For GOP Precinct Conventions
Why #NeverTrump Is The Only Moral Position
Republican Primary Endorsements -- 2016
A Proposed Shorter RPT Platform
Pro-Lifers To Release Documents Related To Purchase Of Fetal Tissue By Texas Public Universities!
Who Is Regan Theiler And Why Was She Allowed To Spend Public Funds On A Sole Source Contract For Her Part-Time Employer?
Not My Idea Of A Stimulating Evening
About Trump's Liberty University Speech
Do Not Place The Secessionist "Texas Independence" Measure On The 2016 Republican Primary Ballot
Conservatives Vs. Liberal On Those Engaged In Violent Political Activity

Blogroll


Watchers Council
  • Ask Marion
  • Bookworm Room
  • The Colossus of Rhodey
  • The Glittering Eye
  • GrEaT sAtAn"S gIrLfRiEnD
  • The Independent Sentinel
  • JoshuaPundit
  • Liberty's Spirit
  • New Zeal
  • Nice Deb
  • The Noisy Room
  • The Razor
  • Rhymes With Right
  • The Right Planet
  • Simply Jews
  • Virginia Right!
  • Watcher Of Weasels

  • Political & Religious Blogs