Google
 
Web rhymeswithright.mu.nu

October 26, 2006

Even the Dems Denouce Former President Dhimmi Carter

Since he left office, former President Carter hasn't met a terrorist leader or Third World dictator whose side he won't take against the US or Israel. For doing so, the Left has declared him to be a revered elder statesman.

But now he has gone too far -- even for his own Democrats.

Top Democrats are rushing to repudiate former President Carter’s controversial new book on the Middle East, in which he accuses the Israeli government of maintaining an apartheid system.

Two key party leaders — Democratic National Committee Chairman Howard Dean, party chairman, and House Minority Leader Nancy Pelosi — and several congressmen issued statements Monday saying that the book, “Palestine: Peace Not Apartheid,” does not represent their views on the Jewish state.

“It is wrong to suggest that the Jewish people would support a government in Israel or anywhere else that institutionalizes ethnically based oppression, and Democrats reject that allegation vigorously,” Pelosi wrote in a statement. “With all due respect to former President Carter, he does not speak for the Democratic Party on Israel.”

Carter’s book is being published by Simon & Schuster and is slated for release November 14. In an advanced draft copy of the work, obtained by the Forward, the former president asserts that Israel’s current policies in the Palestinian territories constitute “a system of apartheid, with two peoples occupying the same land but completely separated from each other, with Israelis totally dominant and suppressing violence by depriving Palestinians of their basic human rights.” He argues that Israel’s settlement policy is principally to blame for the failure of peace initiatives in the Middle East.

Dean also took issue with Carter’s assessment.

“While I have tremendous respect for former President Carter, I fundamentally disagree and do not support his analysis of Israel and the Israeli-Palestinian conflict,” Dean wrote in a statement. “On this issue President Carter speaks for himself, the opinions in his book are his own, they are not the views or position of the Democratic Party. I and other Democrats will continue to stand with Israel in its battle against terrorism and for a lasting peace with its neighbors.”

Several Democratic members of New York’s House delegation — Reps. Steve Israel, Charlie Rangel and Jerrold Nadler — also have issued statements criticizing Carter’s book, as did Rep. John Conyers, Jr., a Michigan Democrat who is often criticized by members of the Jewish community for his failure to support Israel in a certain instance. Last summer, Conyers was one of eight House members who did not vote for a resolution backing the Jewish state in the wake of the Hezbollah attacks.

Good grief -- when even an anti-Semite like Conyers denounces someone for being too critical of Israel, you have to recognize that they have gone way too far.

And another sign that the argument goes way too far is when French government officials start taking the opposite side of the issue.

rench Foreign Minister Philippe Douste-Blazy declared last week he has changed his opinion on Israel's controversial separation barrier in light of its drastic effect on terror, forcing French authorities to clarify their position on the issue.

The barrier, which separates the West Bank from the rest of Israel, has garnered much criticism for creating a ghetto-style situation for the Palestinians and for allegedly appropriating Palestinian land on the Israeli side.

But although the French government has been critical of it since the start of its construction four years ago, Douste-Blazy has now reversed the feeling.

“I have significantly evolved on the matter of the separation fence” said Douste-Blazy on French Jewish television TFJ on Thursday. “Although the wall was a moral and ethical problem for me, when I realised terror attacks were reduced by 80 percent in the areas where the wall was erected, I understood I didn’t have the right to think that way.”

Douste-Blazy is the first high ranking French official to openly state his support for the security fence.

Remember -- he is part of a government that opposed and led the condemnation of the security fence. That there is now support for the fence from a member of that government should be seen as significant.

Buit not to worry -- Hamas is still in Dhimmi Carter's side.





|| Greg, 04:50 PM || Permalink || Comments (14) || Comments || TrackBacks (0) ||

Trackback Information for Even the Dems Denouce Former President Dhimmi Carter

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://blog2.mu.nu/cgi/trackback.cgi/191101
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 'Even the Dems Denouce Former President Dhimmi Carter'.

Comments on Even the Dems Denouce Former President Dhimmi Carter

What you see as a semblance of healthy resistance to "hatred" on the part of Democrats is just the opposite. More fearful cowering to the Zionist Lobby in fervid concern about losing their votes of Jews etc. This of course only continues to endanger American security, as in the long term Israel's viability is tenous and the righteous wrath emanating from Islam at America's continuing subsidization of Palestinian oppression will continue to bring disaster to us.


The Arab world knows America was shoved into Iraq to protect Israel by the same Lobby to which the Democrats capitulate. 9/11 followed by the no-win quagmire there hints at increasing losses for America should both parties continue obediantly serving Israel.

|| Posted by Ken Hoop, October 27, 2006 08:47 AM ||

Hamas is "in his side"? Well, Carter did always consider himself just a bit too Christ-like. Maybe I should have said "Himself".

|| Posted by Honza P, October 27, 2006 11:24 AM ||

http://www.dailystar.com.lb/article.asp?edition_id=10&categ_id=5&article_id=76415


sanctioned by the Democratic Party?

|| Posted by Ken Hoop, October 27, 2006 03:37 PM ||

Sorry about the typo -- if that is all you have to say, then don't.

And KKKen, sorry that the dead Palis didn't get a chance to kill more Jews for you.

|| Posted by Rhymes With Right, October 27, 2006 05:59 PM ||

Jimmy Carter's Admission of Guilt

|| Posted by Macker, October 27, 2006 08:08 PM ||

I'm sorrier the racist Jews DID kill more Palestinains for you.

|| Posted by Ken Hoop, October 28, 2006 12:12 PM ||

KKKen -- when terrorists use civilians as shields, then the guilt for the deaths of those civilians falls on the terrorists, not the Israelis.

|| Posted by Rhymes With Right, October 28, 2006 04:58 PM ||

You mean like the20 Israeli soldiers who got killed in that kibbutz along with the kibbutz members?

|| Posted by Ken Hoop, October 29, 2006 08:07 PM ||

By unguided, untargeted rockets that were launched with no particular target in mind -- and which killed troops OUTSIDE the kibbutz, because of IDF directives that they not live in civilian communities during time of war.

|| Posted by Rhymes With Right, October 29, 2006 08:43 PM ||

IDF servicemen have charged their own government with wanton, aimless use of weaponry against civilians, including cluster bombs.

|| Posted by Ken Hoop, October 30, 2006 04:51 PM ||

Yeah, KKKen -- and John Kerry claimed US troops in Vietnam were the equivalent of the Golden Horde of Ghengis Khan.  In neither case does the charge stand up to serious scrutiny.

|| Posted by Rhymes With Right, October 30, 2006 06:57 PM ||

that's a canard against Kerry who made clear he was not describing all troops. Kerry, however betrayed his legacy by initially approving Bush's war based on WMD lies, even as many Democrats did not.

|| Posted by Ken Hoop, October 31, 2006 02:04 PM ||

Well, KKKen, Kerry did not make it clear that such was the case -- and also confessed to war crimes himself.  Somehow he has never called for his own prosecution, or those of any other Vietnam War "criminal".

By the way -- Kerry continues to show his class in the present.

|| Posted by Rhymes With Right, October 31, 2006 06:00 PM ||

You have a typically myopic American vision of what is politically important at the moment. In this framework, it is that a large majority of Iraqis, since 2004 in fact, have registered approval of insurgent attacks on an occupier they consider brutal.


This is one reason why the insurgency has proven so resilient, as classic successful counter insurgency requires a sympathetic native populace .


Easier to strike out at Kerry ,the symptom, than the root cause, the failed war itself.


 

|| Posted by Ken Hoop, October 31, 2006 06:47 PM ||
Post a comment

Remember personal info?


 

 





AnotherMunublogSmall.jpg





Winner - 2014 Fabulous 50 Blog Awards
Winner - 2014 Fabulous 50 Blog Awards

Winner - 2013 Fabulous 50 Blog Awards

Winner - 2012 Fabulous 50 Blog Awards

Winner - 2011 Fabulous 50 Blog Awards

Winner - 2010 Fabulous 50 Blog Awards

Winner - 2009 Fabulous 50 Blog Awards

Posts by Category

Announcements (posts: 13)
Blogging (posts: 187)
Border Issues & Immigration (posts: 421)
deferred (posts: 4)
Education (posts: 685)
Entertainment & Sports (posts: 483)
Guns & Gun Control (posts: 65)
History (posts: 329)
Humor (posts: 88)
Israel/Middle East (posts: 44)
Medical News (posts: 54)
Military (posts: 273)
News (posts: 1570)
Paid Advertising (posts: 234)
Personal (posts: 108)
Politics (posts: 5261)
Race & Racism (posts: 281)
Religion (posts: 819)
Terrorism (posts: 884)
Texas GOP Platform Reform Project (posts: 4)
The Courts (posts: 310)
Watcher's Council (posts: 482)
World Affairs (posts: 345)

Archives

January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
December 0000



MuNuviana



Licensing

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Powered By

Powered by
Movable Type 2.64
AnotherMunublogSmall.jpg

Administrative Stuff

Email Me
Syndicate this site (XML)

Advertising Disclosure

adpolicy.gif

About Me

NAME: Greg
AGE: 50-ish
SEX: Male
MARITAL STATUS: Married
OCCUPATION: Social Studies Teacher
LOCATION: Seabrook, TX
DISCLAIMER: All posts reflect my views alone, and not the view of my wife, my dogs, my employer, or anyone else. All comments reflect the view of the commenter, and permitting a comment to remain on this site in no way indicates my support for the ideas expressed in the comment.

Search This Site


Support This Site



Recent Entries

Who Is Regan Theiler And Why Was She Allowed To Spend Public Funds On A Sole Source Contract For Her Part-Time Employer?
Not My Idea Of A Stimulating Evening
About Trump's Liberty University Speech
Do Not Place The Secessionist "Texas Independence" Measure On The 2016 Republican Primary Ballot
Conservatives Vs. Liberal On Those Engaged In Violent Political Activity
Tom Mechler Makes His Case Against Moving The 2016 RPT Convention
Jared Woodfill Makes His Case For Moving The 2016 RPT Convention
Questions About Moving The 2016 RPT Convention
Reject The Call To Move 2016 Republican Party Of Texas Convention
It Is Too Bad That Political Parties Cannot Reject Voters Who Seek To Join, Stop Would-Be Candidates Who Want To Run

Blogroll


Watchers Council
  • Ask Marion
  • Bookworm Room
  • The Colossus of Rhodey
  • The Glittering Eye
  • GrEaT sAtAn"S gIrLfRiEnD
  • The Independent Sentinel
  • JoshuaPundit
  • Liberty's Spirit
  • New Zeal
  • Nice Deb
  • The Noisy Room
  • The Razor
  • Rhymes With Right
  • The Right Planet
  • Simply Jews
  • Virginia Right!
  • Watcher Of Weasels

  • Political & Religious Blogs