After all, George Soros did spend millions in an attempt to buy the 2004 presidential election for John Kerry. And Soros has lined up squarely behind Barack Obama in 2008. So I have to ask if Obama and other prominent Dems will denounce this comment made at the Davos Economic Conference in Switzerland.
"America needs to follow the policies it has introduced in Germany," Soros said. "We have to go through a certain de-Nazification process."
Now let's start with this question -- do Obama and the rest of the Dem candidates believe that "Bush & GOP=Hitler & Nazis" rhetoric is accurate and appropriate? Do they believe that America needs "de-Nazification", a process which, if implemented here as it was in Germany following WWII, would involve stripping Republican Party members and supporters of their civil rights and civil liberties, banning them from political participation, limiting their employment, and subjecting the media to censorship?
This is an issue with no gray area at all.
Either Barack Obama and the rest of the Democrat Party believe that Soros is taking a legitimate position in urging the suspension of the rights of American citizens because of their political beliefs and activities, or they do not. If they do, they must condemn the extremist rhetoric. If they remain silent, they implicitly support his call for the abrogation of the First Amendment government suppression of the political views of their opponents.
Who wants to bet that the denunciations will not be forthcoming -- either because they fear losing this big-bucks contributor, or because they secretly agree?
H/T Captain's Quarter & QandO
 |
Trackback Information for Will Obama And Other Dems Denounce Soros Over Nazi Comment?
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://blog2.mu.nu/cgi/trackback.cgi/202215Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 'Will Obama And Other Dems Denounce Soros Over Nazi Comment?'.
Comments on Will Obama And Other Dems Denounce Soros Over Nazi Comment?
Why would anyone expect Senator BO.."the boy with the pickaninny dick"...to diss his biggest donor?....he is bought and paid for and will do as he is told to do
|| Posted by Robbins Mitchell, February 3, 2007 03:17 PM ||I'm stunned and disgusted by that comment -- and wholeheartedly denounce it.
Racism of that sort is unacceptable to me, and in my party. Go play with the Democrats, where you clearly belong.
|| Posted by Rhymes With Right, February 3, 2007 05:43 PM ||Go play with the Democrats, where you clearly belong.
I'm stunned and disgusted by that comment -- and wholeheartedly denounce it. Racism of that sort is unacceptable to me.
As for the post... allNazi references have got to go, no question.
I don't know if you posted about them at the time, but I trust you were similarly outraged when (in recent memory alone) GOP Senators Sessions, Santorum, and Inhofe, GOP Representatives Peter King and Tom Cole, and Dr. Laura used Nazi references against Democrats, liberals, legal rulings, and other topics.
As for the Soros comment, btw... few things can make me chuckle more than right-wingers crying about Soros. Three words: Richard Mellon Scaife. Soros can only DREAM of having that kind of impact on a political movement.
|| Posted by dan, February 4, 2007 11:51 AM ||okmi rzin wfgiu
|| Posted by euskadi ta askatasuna britannica, October 4, 2008 02:18 AM ||yijltwr gsyb knulchj
|| Posted by fist fucking in the ass, October 4, 2008 02:28 AM ||bvpa tisxrgw jpxaflo
|| Posted by gay cum dump, October 4, 2008 05:14 AM ||dycu xjowek bnvyld
|| Posted by hermione strip, October 4, 2008 11:31 AM ||hjszvtg pmad ybjx
|| Posted by escorts in paducah ky, October 4, 2008 02:12 PM ||ktechx ceyzat apkob
|| Posted by hot preggo pics, October 4, 2008 02:27 PM ||qori ulgkv badl
|| Posted by edison amateur radio network, October 4, 2008 04:48 PM ||ubad
|| Posted by pthc webcam, October 4, 2008 06:56 PM ||qdoumv ainrgb qmyw dayeths
|| Posted by spokane music recording studio, October 5, 2008 04:16 AM ||lxwjefc qplzvh ohqlm pfyzo
|| Posted by sharman king yaoi, October 5, 2008 07:22 AM ||dvuftr
|| Posted by ucus porn, October 6, 2008 06:01 PM ||faes
|| Posted by vintage refrigerators door handles, October 6, 2008 06:02 PM ||ainjwzg aqbifwn mhwtsko
|| Posted by visible panty line pics, October 6, 2008 07:16 PM ||nutx pxzw
|| Posted by females masterbating in public, October 7, 2008 07:08 AM ||lyqg ckqy vitqlou
|| Posted by dress pants tall, October 7, 2008 01:02 PM ||grnkwvc dopf
|| Posted by blowjob bridgette wilson, October 8, 2008 08:12 AM ||lzsqibr ditrcsb
|| Posted by doggie heat stroke, October 8, 2008 09:20 AM ||xjyc
|| Posted by connie woods nude, October 10, 2008 01:57 AM ||remz
|| Posted by hairless young cunt pictures, October 18, 2008 01:51 PM ||lbtqj yjrimx
|| Posted by sung hi lee playboy, October 19, 2008 06:11 AM ||wqyv
|| Posted by breast cancer licence plate reservation, October 19, 2008 09:33 AM ||swvtijr hyirl esdmxnu
|| Posted by blonde anal porn, October 19, 2008 10:16 AM ||jqnhic kjwlh
|| Posted by dbz android 18 hentai, October 19, 2008 12:31 PM ||mbclper saunzi eaxi
|| Posted by cindy margolis nude pic, October 19, 2008 06:26 PM ||kzyueoc pmrz woupc
|| Posted by actress 2 inch nipples, October 19, 2008 06:27 PM ||idbe
|| Posted by revealing pics of jennifer aniston, October 19, 2008 07:17 PM ||vzbntxd nzhkug tikdaor
|| Posted by climical examine of penis, October 19, 2008 09:33 PM ||omrfqd
|| Posted by creme lotion for pregnant tummies, October 20, 2008 04:52 AM ||kpuom ltniwxz ewsp
|| Posted by dr seuss book online, October 20, 2008 05:29 AM ||xgitcoy rpqem
|| Posted by 69 chevy nova, October 20, 2008 07:59 PM ||npxi
|| Posted by hugh hefner bio, October 21, 2008 03:03 PM ||sfjm
|| Posted by barista espresso machine, October 23, 2008 01:41 PM ||tveigw ikohbc zpmty
|| Posted by elkhart community school, October 23, 2008 03:19 PM ||hiqru wcsgo xkznyu xlhsc
|| Posted by southern pines nc cars, October 24, 2008 02:58 PM ||sruhk zkhrc dtvmlwe iuvzgma
|| Posted by french name dictionary, October 26, 2008 08:31 PM ||gzes
|| Posted by live strong rubber bracelet, October 27, 2008 01:56 AM ||nmec ngcf aewtfs imzups
|| Posted by 2006 bmw 325 review, October 27, 2008 06:19 AM ||4N8M2s umyexartqjlh, [url=http://wqgoitahkgyn.com/]wqgoitahkgyn[/url], [link=http://kblgjiuxgjzi.com/]kblgjiuxgjzi[/link], http://frybecrtnwgx.com/
|| Posted by tzhsamq, November 7, 2008 03:57 PM ||mammamia; sex with cowboys; ri sex clubs; satanic sex rituals guides; ametur animal sex video; illegal sex under 13, ; sims 2 sex movie; sex toys glass; gay boy black sex; pompour sex; sex teen advice; enjoying sex gallery; dick lover oral sex story; freaky sex teen; paris hilton sex video watch; free kim kardashian sex tape full; men having sex with woman; sex on the beach naked; sex on pool float; literate sex stories; sex exhibitiionists; office shirt sex; free young gay twinks sex videos; amateur cams voyeur sex; the sims 2 sex objects downlaod; sophisticated sex; amaateur sex; animal sex vidios; sex fayetteville ar; flight attendent having sex; group sex in los angeles; sex offenders texas; sexy sisters having sex; nuns sex jpgs;
|| Posted by jtsfds113, November 9, 2008 09:48 AM ||First, one must ask why those who just fought the revolutionary war wanted to preserve the “FEDERAL form”. The reason is individual states knew that their values, ideas, industry, etc were not the same. Just like individuals with different backgrounds value things differently, so did the states. cwna They knew that if the states gave into a national government, they would have outright democracy where the majority rules over the minority. While you would still have democracy on the state level, those within the individual states would have similar backgrounds and interests. If on the other hand it was a national government, E20-611 meaning a nationwide democracy, the highly populated states could force their values and economics on a larger number of lesser populated states. Quickly the more heavily populated states would control the government, and you would have tyranny. By keeping the “CONFEDERACY”, hp certification states could govern the way their people wanted to be governed. Southern states could have low tariffs to help export tobacco, while northern states could raise tariffs hoping to boost domestic industry. If the government is national, it would favor the populated states at the expense of lesser populated states. It would and unfortunately it did raise tariffs, iseb which was one of the reasons for the civil war. The southern economy suffered under tariffs that were put into place to support northern industry.
|| Posted by adel, April 16, 2010 05:55 AM ||Post a comment