Or at least of the Second Amendment – they will continue to engage in absolutist idolatry of the First Amendment, even if it undermines the war effort.
As the Army's suicide rate hits record levels in the Iraq war, there's small wonder practically everyone in Congress wants to deal with the parallel emerging crisis of depressed veterans tempted to take their own lives. Everyone, that is, except Senator Tom Coburn, Republican of Oklahoma. He stands alone in blocking final passage of a suicide prevention bill in fear that the government's record-keeping on troubled vets might somehow crimp their ability to purchase handguns.Even the craven gun lobby should manage some shame over this absurd example of Second Amendment idolatry.
The House has unanimously approved a measure mandating the screening of all veterans for suicide risk, but Senator Coburn worries that veterans' medical data might be appropriated by other agencies to deny that all-encompassing right to wield arms on the domestic front.
If Congress can somehow guarantee confidentiality, I'd support this bill. But unfortunately, Coburn is correct in fearing that these records could somehow be abused . After all, I remember some 900 FBI files turned over to political appointees in the Clinton White House, the disclosure of top secret national security programs by the NY Times – and today's lead story at the Washington Post is all about a leaked copy of a classified report. Imagine the concern that this confidential information will get out and be used to deny veterans the right to own a gun!
I'll tell you what – I'll give up my absolutism on the Second Amendment when the New York Times gives up its absolutism about the First Amendment. Until then, I'll stick by the views of the Founding Fathers.
Oh, and I can't help but be struck by the ignorance of our founding documents exhibited in the editorial as well.
But that's to care for them as human beings, under that other constitutional right — to life, liberty and the pursuit of happiness.
Guys – that isn't a constitutional right. It is a statement of principles in the Declaration of Independence. My tenth graders even know that.
OPEN TRACKBACKING AT The Virtuous Republic, Perri Nelson's Website, Diary of the Mad Pigeon, Rosemary's Thoughts, Allie Is Wired, DeMediacratic Nation, The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns, Right Truth, The World According to Carl, Pirate's Cove, The Pink Flamingo, Webloggin, Leaning Straight Up, and Conservative Cat, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.
Trackback Information for NYTimes Condemns Absolutist Idolatry Of Bill Of Rights
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://blog2.mu.nu/cgi/trackback.cgi/223226Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 'NYTimes Condemns Absolutist Idolatry Of Bill Of Rights'.
Comments on NYTimes Condemns Absolutist Idolatry Of Bill Of Rights
NedSIy srubamwkzlyp, [url=http://rgjoucuzhhpm.com/]rgjoucuzhhpm[/url], [link=http://sahwnpnevszy.com/]sahwnpnevszy[/link], http://btmzzhwfkrky.com/
|| Posted by qlgftqk, June 17, 2009 12:00 AM ||Post a comment