But then again, it will be ignored by the mainstream press -- or even echoed approvingly -- because the racist in question is an Asian-American commentator for an Asian-American publication.
When you see a person of color, you expect someone with similar values, views, beliefs — someone in touch with the emerging new majority. With Jindal, you get someone who very deliberately and proudly downplays his race in order to seek his own individual path. That kind of independence under certain circumstances may be commendable. But only if you happen to agree with his ideas that range from free-market health care, intelligent design instead of evolution, anti-choice and a fenced-in America.
In other words, independent thought is only OK when it leads you to the same conclusion as everyone else. "People of color" have no right to be diverse, the argument goes, because it somehow betrays the collective and their interests.
Tell me, though -- what is it about being Asian-American that requires one support socialized medicine? Is there some reason that one whose ancestry comes from East that obliges one to accept Godless evolution over the notion that there was a Creator of some sort? Does an Oriental heritage mandate taking the anti-life position on abortion? And is there something peculiarly and exclusively Occidental about a desire to see the sovereignty of the United States upheld and our immigration laws enforced so that all who come here are law-abiding?
One would think not, if one is a thinking person. There is no mandatory race-based political ideology, just as there is no exclusively "White" position on these issues that must be upheld lest one be a race-traitor. Indeed, suggesting such a thing would be seen as proof positive that one is a racist of the most vile ilk. And that is precisely the category to which individuals of good will must consign Emil Guillermo and the editors who allowed his piece to be published.
Because after all, the Asian community is a diverse one, encompassing multiple cultures, languages and religious faiths, not to mention histories. With all the contempt for assimilation and support for diversity mouthed by Guillermo, why does he insist that every individual of Asian-American heritage must behave as a part of a Borg-like left-wing racial collective?
H/T Malkin, Culture Warrior, World According To Carl
OPEN TRACKBACKING AT Stop the ACLU, Perri Nelson's Website, , A Blog For All, guerrilla radio, 123beta, Adam's Blog, Stix Blog, The Populist, Shadowscope, The Amboy Times, Leaning Straight Up, The Bullwinkle Blog, Big Dog's Weblog, Conservative Cat, Adeline and Hazel, Conservative Thoughts, Nuke's, Diary of the Mad Pigeon, third world county, Woman Honor Thyself, The Crazy Rants of Samantha Burns, The World According to Carl, Pirate's Cove, Blue Star Chronicles, The Pink Flamingo, CORSARI D'ITALIA, Right Voices, Gone Hollywood, and Church and State, thanks to Linkfest Haven Deluxe.
Trackback Information for Racist Commentator Condemns Jindal As An "Uncle Bob"
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://blog2.mu.nu/cgi/trackback.cgi/228189Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 'Racist Commentator Condemns Jindal As An "Uncle Bob"'.
Comments on Racist Commentator Condemns Jindal As An "Uncle Bob"
For whatever reason, I'm still having issues with trackbacks from my blog (thanks WordPress). So the two entries I'm shamelessly plugging this weekend (thus far) are:
“King Tut” — Steve Martin & The Toot Uncommons
http://www.anniemayhem.com/cgi-bin/wordpress/?p=1183
A video trip back down memory lane inspired by an entry on Planck's Constant blog about Egyptian artifacts, etc.
Louisiana Governor Bobby Jindal — Pt. Deux
|| Posted by Carl, October 26, 2007 09:54 PM ||http://www.anniemayhem.com/cgi-bin/wordpress/?p=1184
Well, another liberal shows his true colors and as such shows why liberals don't follow the mantra of tolerance they espouse.
Post a comment