This time it is un-funny faux intellectual Jon Stewart, who spent the last several years making money off of rooting for George W. Bush to fail.
So let's get this straight -- opposing Comrade Hope'N'Change and his moves toward socialism is "arguably treasonous", but engaging in 9/11Trutherism and hoping that anti-American terrorists defeat US troops in the field is patriotic. I don't know about you, but I'm sure confused, especially since I know what the Constitution says about treason.
Treason against the United States, shall consist only in levying War against them, or in adhering to their Enemies, giving them Aid and Comfort. No Person shall be convicted of Treason unless on the Testimony of two Witnesses to the same overt Act, or on Confession in open Court.
Limbaugh has done nothing of the sort. Can the same be said of Code pink and much of the rest of the anti-war left?
H/T NewsBusters
Trackback Information for Yet Another Liberal Redefines Dissent As Treason, Not Patriotism, In Age Of Obama
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://blog2.mu.nu/cgi/trackback.cgi/258300Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 'Yet Another Liberal Redefines Dissent As Treason, Not Patriotism, In Age Of Obama'.
Comments on Yet Another Liberal Redefines Dissent As Treason, Not Patriotism, In Age Of Obama
lying viagra - viagra
|| Posted by Ttrvaktx, February 10, 2012 05:55 AM ||Post a comment