If the New York Times allows this scumbag to remain on its payroll after this, then the paper loses all credibility.
Here's his take on the horrific attack in Arizona which cost two lives (including a federal judge) and which left many, including a congresswoman, wounded.
![krugman-disgrace[1].jpg](http://rhymeswithright.mu.nu/archives/images/krugman-disgrace[1].jpg)
Scumbag that he is, Krugman then goes on to try to connect Limbaugh, Beck, Palin, and others to this incident, and insists that the GOP leadership must take a stand against the "rhetoric" of "hatemongers".
Personally, this GOP leader will condemn hatemongers right now -- and I therefor denounce Paul Krugman in the harshest terms, and demand that he be fired for what he wrote above. His indecent attempt to declare dissent from the policies of the Obama Administration and the Democrats is disgraceful and objectively unAmerican.
And even more disgusting is how he ends his hateful little exercise in political character assassination.
Update: I’m going to take down comments on this one; they would need a lot of moderating, because the crazies are coming out in force, and it’s all too likely to turn into a flame war.
In other words, Krugman doesn't want anyone calling him out on his disgraceful words, so he's preemptively censoring his critics. What wussified arrogance from this contemptible little coward.
Trackback Information for Paul Krugman -- Gutless, Wussified Political Hack
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://blog2.mu.nu/cgi/trackback.cgi/276851Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 'Paul Krugman -- Gutless, Wussified Political Hack'.
Comments on Paul Krugman -- Gutless, Wussified Political Hack
You are perfectly aware of the fact that these shootings are a direct result of Sarah Palin's terrorist map. In attacking Krugman, you are shooting the messenger. You know for a fact that this is the right's fault.
|| Posted by libhomo, January 9, 2011 11:16 AM ||Actually, I know no such thing. For that matter, neither do you. All you are doing is making an assertion without evidence. You have as much evidence of Sarah Palin being responsible for this attack as I do of your being a child molester.
And consider these examples of similar uses of targets on opposition political figures. Clearly what she said was well within the bounds of acceptable political speech.
http://rhymeswithright.mu.nu/archives/300085.php
http://patterico.com/2011/01/08/markos-blames-palin-for-giffords-shooting-but-theres-just-one-problem-daily-kos-put-a-bulls-eye-on-giffords-too/
|| Posted by Rhymes With Right, January 9, 2011 12:50 PM ||You are perfectly aware of the fact that these shootings are a direct result of Sarah Palin's terrorist map. In attacking Krugman, you are shooting the messenger. You know for a fact that this is the right's fault.
What a laugh. And YOU are merely a sub-80 IQ stooge who parrots radical lefty talking points. End of story.
Grow the hell up, idiot.
|| Posted by Hube, January 9, 2011 01:51 PM ||Post a comment