Google
 
Web rhymeswithright.mu.nu

February 11, 2012

Should The Catholic Church Go Medieval Over ObamaCare Regulations?

I've debated whether or not to write and publish this post. I've done so for two reasons. First, I parted company with the Catholic Church some years ago over my personal struggles with a church that I still deeply love and respect. Secondly, what I am about to write may strike some as profoundly anti-American, at odds with the notion of separation church and state, and even as hearkening back to a time prior to the election of John F. Kennedy when bigots would suggest that a Catholic president would be under the thumb of the Pope in Rome. Yet in the end, I find myself compelled to write and publish this post because of the critical nature of the attack on religious freedom that has been launched by President Barack Hussein Obama and his administration. As a student of history and political science who also has four years of training in Catholic theology, I believe that what I set forth below is in keeping with the best of American values, Catholic theology, and the obligation of Christians to resist government actions and policies that cannot be reconciled with the Gospel.

* * *

On January 20, 2012, Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius issued a regulation which required religiously affiliated employers to provide their employees with free sterilization and contraceptives(including abortifacients) even if doing so violated the religious tenets of the organization. While there was a small carve-out that would allow actual houses of worship to refrain from offering such coverage, the regulation would require Catholic schools, hospitals, and charities to pay for such insurance coverage if they employed or served a significant number of non-Catholic employees. While the regulation is not aimed directly at the Catholic Church – it applies equally to other faith groups with teachings against sterilization, birth control, and abortion – it is clear that the biggest impact will be upon Catholic groups.

The uproar was immediate and loud. On February 10, President Obama himself seemed to offer a compromise option, but reality is that the changed wording and presentation did not constitute a substantive change of law or policy. What’s more, Senate Majority Leader Harry Reid blocked efforts to introduce and vote on legislation that would have blocked any regulation of this sort, ensuring that President Obama’s allies would ensure that there was no chance to undo the “compromise” – which the President has indicated will be implemented this August. This means that the American people will not have the ability to install new leaders before religious organizations are forced to surrender their principles, pay crippling fines, or shut down.

As I’ve examined the current situation, it strikes me that this attack on religion is unprecedented in American history and that it flies in the face of the guarantees found in the Bill of Rights. But attacks upon the faith are not unprecedented in the history of the Catholic Church. From Apostolic times through the Middle Ages and Reformation and up to the present, there have been political leaders whose lust for power and personal glorification have led them to seek to undercut the teachings of the Church and its spiritual prerogatives. The faithful died in the arenas of the Roman Empire rather than burn incense at the altars of the emperors, popes engaged in political and military conflict with enemies through the ages, and courageous bishops and priests spread the great encyclical letter Mit Brennender Sorge in the face of the Nazi regime in 1938. And if Pope John Paul II had the ability to undermine Communism in Poland and the other nations behind the Iron Curtain, what might his friend, co-worker, and successor Pope Benedict XVI be able to do regarding this effort by Barack Obama to force the Catholic Church to act contrary to its teachings?

Some might ask Josef Stalin’s question – how many divisions does the pope have? But one need only remember that the Church has survived conflicts with greater men than the current occupant of 1600 Pennsylvania Avenue and that Christ himself promised Simon Peter that the gates of Hell will not prevail against him and his successors – a promise kept for some two millennia. All that is necessary is for Benedict to deploy the full force of the spiritual weapons in his arsenal. It would not be unreasonable for him to follow some of the historical precedents for their use in this case. Indeed, I'd argue that the Pope might consider taking a course that has both modern precedent and roots in the medieval period.

To this end, I believe that an encyclical letter, with its definitive version written in English, ought to be issued. In doing this, Pope Benedict would be following the precedent of Pope Pius XI in issuing Mit Brennender Sorge in 1938. The young Joseph Ratzinger would have heard as this denunciation of Nazism was read from the pulpit of his church on Palm Sunday, 1938, as it was in virtually every German church. Benedict should act in kind now, speaking as pastor to his flock and as head of state challenging the misdeeds of the American government -- and require that the encyclical be read in every Catholic church on the same Sunday.

What should be included in this encyclical? I would suggest several elements. The first part would be a restatement of the teachings of Vatican II on the proper relationship of church and state, and an analysis as to how the Obama Regime mandate is incompatible with that relationship. It should be made clear that this is not a claim of special privilege, but a function of natural law that applies to all who claim the title of Christian and to non-Christians as well. No government, whether democracy, monarchy, or dictatorship, has within the scope of its authority to direct a faith community to commit actions that are at odds with its fundamental teachings.

The second part of the encyclical should lay out the consequences of the promulgation of this new regulation and its successor. This should begin with an announcement that Secretary of Health and Human Services Kathleen Sebelius is immediately excommunicated, as are any other Catholics within the senior staff of the department. In addition, immediate excommunication should also fall upon any Catholic member of Congress who voted for ObamaCare. Lest there be any confusion on the matter, the individuals excommunicated should be listed by name. In addition, latae sententia will be incurred by any Catholic who directly enforces or causes to be enforced the requirements of the new regulations. Similar sanctions should be directed at state officials in the 28 state with similar provisions in state law. At least as regards the public officials, the lifting of the excommunication ought to be reserved to the Holy Father himself. The second consequence contained within the encyclical ought to include the imposition of interdict upon the United States if the regulation is not rescinded by a certain date, with the interdict to be lifted only upon the lifting of the regulation and the return of any and all property seized as a consequence of failure to comply with the regulation.

The third part of the encyclical ought to be a reminder to American Catholics of the importance of bringing their faith into the public square and voting booth. This section ought to note the right, long recognized by the Church, of a people to remove an unjust ruler when the opportunity arises -- and draw the parallel between this and the words of Thomas Jefferson, who in the Declaration of Independence declared that the people have a right to alter or abolish any government which becomes destructive of their rights. It should be made clear that this is not intended to be a new Regnans in Excelsis, but rather a reminder that it is within the power of every American to see to the removal of civil officials who implement and enforce violations of religious freedom via their responsible exercise of the franchise at the next election -- and that it is morally obligatory for them to do so.

And lest the encyclical be seen as a rejection of the whole idea of health care accessibility, there should be a fourth section reminding the faithful of the Church's continuing devotion to the Corporal and Spiritual Works of Mercy, and that it is for this reason that the many schools, hospitals, and agencies subject to the Obama regulation operate. Beyond that, it should be made clear that the Church finds it appropriate for government to be involved with assisting in the performance of the works of mercy, and that the faithful may legitimately support or oppose specific government programs and policies for doing so to the degree that they do not infringe upon the freedoms of individual or the prerogative of the Church itself to implement its own moral teachings.

Will such an encyclical cause an uproar among the secular elite of this country? Certainly. It will also expose those who claim to support policies based upon their interpretation of the teachings of Christ but who are in fact hostile to their fellow citizens who would follow the counter-cultural message of the Gospel. Yes, such an encyclical would separate the wheat from the chaff in American public life. And that, my friends, would be a very good thing.





|| Greg, 08:29 PM || Permalink || Comments (9) || Comments || TrackBacks (0) ||

Trackback Information for Should The Catholic Church Go Medieval Over ObamaCare Regulations?

TrackBack URL for this entry: http://blog2.mu.nu/cgi/trackback.cgi/280202
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 'Should The Catholic Church Go Medieval Over ObamaCare Regulations?'.

Comments on Should The Catholic Church Go Medieval Over ObamaCare Regulations?

A great post. Indeed, I think it far past time for the Church to begin holding the feet of left wing Catholics to the fire, at least to the extent that they would be complicit in these attacks on the Church.

|| Posted by GW, February 12, 2012 09:51 PM ||

It's a hard and painful situation, one that I've been stewing about myself. I think that interdict is excessive but I think I understand your reasoning.

In the discussions of the policy of the Obama White House in this matter note how contraception is the emphasis rather than sterilization or abortifacients. I think that's message framing.

One thing I'm curious about. I haven't seen any mention of requirements for fertility treatments. Those could be as problematic as the "contraception" requirements.

|| Posted by Dave Schuler, February 13, 2012 10:10 AM ||

Dear Greg:

I can understand your leaving a Church that you love. Been there, done that. If I hadn't come back, it could have been an absolute disaster ("It would have been better if he had not been born.")

If there is more than one priest in your area, shop around to find a priest created in God's image, not the other way around, that you can work with.

Do it now. We are the Church of the sinners, not the Church of the absolutely saved or lost before death. Did you get the memo that gave the exact day and hour of your death? I didn't get one either. Whitney Houston's time has run out, just like Michael Jackson's. How much longer do you have before you must finalize your most important decision?

Two of the Pope's biggest weapons for individual warriors are prayer and fasting. Use them for yourself as well as for others.

Greg, open yourself up and come back. We are all waiting here for you, with love in Jesus Christ.

|| Posted by Ron19, February 13, 2012 04:12 PM ||

Greg: I once attended classes to convert to Catholicism because I wanted some consistency for my ex (a Latin American conservative Catholic) and our daughter (who we were raising as Catholic).

I couldn't do it.

Being a [fairly unpracticing] Protestant my whole life, I found that I suddenly could not subordinate myself to "go betweens" like priests, bishops and the Pope. No disrespect intended, of course.

Great post, BTW.

|| Posted by Hube, February 16, 2012 08:59 AM ||

Clarification: Should read "my NOW-ex." We were married back then ...

|| Posted by Hube, February 16, 2012 09:02 AM ||

I respect that religious view, Hube -- speaking as someone who parted ways with the Catholic Church myself. Oh, yeah -- and married a Protestant minister.

|| Posted by Rhymes With Right, February 16, 2012 04:20 PM ||

A fine article and deserving of a Watcher of Weasels Council win!

I'm not Catholic, but as someone who majored in Religious Education Ministry I have a good understanding of all the different Christian denominations as well as other religions.

I believe that to many have gone over to the dark side, serving as lclubs or an arm of the Liberal/Progressive agenda (many Methodists, Episcopalians, Presbyterians). Baptists and Catholics seem to be holding on to basic Biblical faith and beliefs.

This demand by government to force individuals and groups to do their bidding is beyond anything we have seen before. It goes further than religion, but if the faithful do not stand up and lead the charge against it, where will these type demands end?

This really is a line in the sand and I'm hoping the Catholics will take a stand so that the rest of us can follow.

Debbie
Right Truth

|| Posted by Debbie, February 17, 2012 09:42 AM ||

All of the American Bishops have joined in condemnation of the HHS ruling. This hasn't happened in a while, if I recall correctly. Many Catholics are angry about the HHS ruling, in our church (a granite solid Democrat County) we applauded when the Bishops letter was read. Ok, so I started it, but then the three Doc's in church picked it up, and in the end half of us were clapping at 7:30am mass.

-It will be interesting to see what will happens to the Daughters of Charity, that will be a slow and quiet process, but my guess is that it will inevitably be reformed.

|| Posted by Floyd Alsbach, February 20, 2012 06:24 PM ||

I think the idea of an encyclical is brilliant. Since I'm an American Catholic I'm not so keen on the interdict part. Those "go betweens" mentioned by Hube are ministers described and blessed by Jesus Christ to do His work. Whether Hube likes them or not, they are an indispensable part of His church.

Unfortunately, the bad guys won't flinch at an encyclical. They and their media lapdogs would wear it as a badge of COURAGE (in their own squalid imaginations). We face the same situation that Jesus and Paul faced. We cannot fight and win. We can only convert people through acts of love; one or two at a time. But if we ALL do it, that's thousands, perhaps millions at a time. And we will triumph as surely as the sun will rise in the east.

Mike

|| Posted by Mike, February 28, 2012 11:11 PM ||
Post a comment

Remember personal info?


 

 





AnotherMunublogSmall.jpg





Winner - 2013 Fabulous 50 Blog Awards

Winner - 2012 Fabulous 50 Blog Awards

Winner - 2011 Fabulous 50 Blog Awards

Winner - 2010 Fabulous 50 Blog Awards

Winner - 2009 Fabulous 50 Blog Awards

Posts by Category

Announcements (posts: 13)
Blogging (posts: 174)
Border Issues & Immigration (posts: 391)
deferred (posts: 4)
Education (posts: 647)
Entertainment & Sports (posts: 476)
Guns & Gun Control (posts: 64)
History (posts: 318)
Humor (posts: 83)
Israel/Middle East (posts: 15)
Medical News (posts: 53)
Military (posts: 269)
News (posts: 1527)
Paid Advertising (posts: 231)
Personal (posts: 103)
Politics (posts: 4890)
Race & Racism (posts: 254)
Religion (posts: 796)
Terrorism (posts: 848)
The Courts (posts: 302)
Watcher's Council (posts: 425)
World Affairs (posts: 338)

Archives

January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
December 0000



MuNuviana



Licensing

Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Powered By

Powered by
Movable Type 2.64
AnotherMunublogSmall.jpg

Administrative Stuff

Email Me
Syndicate this site (XML)

Advertising Disclosure

adpolicy.gif

About Me

NAME: Greg
AGE: 50-ish
SEX: Male
MARITAL STATUS: Married
OCCUPATION: Social Studies Teacher
LOCATION: Seabrook, TX
DISCLAIMER: All posts reflect my views alone, and not the view of my wife, my dogs, my employer, or anyone else. All comments reflect the view of the commenter, and permitting a comment to remain on this site in no way indicates my support for the ideas expressed in the comment.

Search This Site


Support This Site




Recent Entries

The Twelfth Doctor Is In The House
Wendy Davis Caught In More Lies?
Bar Admission Absurdity In California
Wendy And Sarah -- A Comparison
Greta Van Susteren -- Female Chauvinist Sow
Obama Advisors Declare That President Will Institute Thugocracy If Republicans Don't Give Him What He Wants
Home Delivery Suckage From The Houston Chronicle
Watcher's Council Results
Hyperbolic Stupidity About Hillary Clinton From Anthony Weiner
Let's Call It What It Is -- SNOW DAY!

Blogroll


Watchers Council
  • Ask Marion
  • Bookworm Room
  • The Colossus of Rhodey
  • The Glittering Eye
  • GrEaT sAtAn"S gIrLfRiEnD
  • The Independent Sentinel
  • JoshuaPundit
  • Liberty's Spirit
  • New Zeal
  • Nice Deb
  • The Noisy Room
  • The Razor
  • Rhymes With Right
  • The Right Planet
  • Simply Jews
  • Virginia Right!
  • Watcher Of Weasels

  • Political & Religious Blogs