This should speak volumes.
![120805-romney-vs-obama[1].jpg](http://rhymeswithright.mu.nu/archives/images/120805-romney-vs-obama[1].jpg)
Mitt Romney created jobs and made money. If you had given him $1000 to invest when he started Bain and left it in his hands, you would be a millionaire dozens of times over -- and it would be your money to do with as you choose.
Barack Obama lost nearly every dime of your tax dollars -- but it doesn't matter to him, because he has no skin in the game and no accountability (other than at the ballot box). And even if his investments of your money had been wildly successful, you would not have seen a penny of the profits -- but the same "green energy" hucksters who got money from Obama are injecting green back into his campaign, but not the US Treasury.
Now remind me again why we should leave failed president Barack Obama in charge of the economy, rather than giving successful businessman Mitt Romney the nod in November.
H/T Doug Ross
 |
Trackback Information for Romney Vs. Obama On Investment
TrackBack URL for this entry: http://blog2.mu.nu/cgi/trackback.cgi/281459Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 'Romney Vs. Obama On Investment'.
Comments on Romney Vs. Obama On Investment
Excellent article. It is about the economy. He will destroy it if he gets back in.
|| Posted by Sara Noble, August 10, 2012 11:06 AM ||Not that it will matter on fact-free right-wing blog, but green energy companies that "Obama invested in" (ludicrous statement) failed at a lower rate than Bain Capital investments.
|| Posted by Hubabbel, October 31, 2012 02:16 PM ||Your liberal talking point is showing.
Yes, the companies Bain purchased failed at a higher rate -- because Bain's business model was to invest in failing businesses and then try to save them. If Bain were a physician, it would have been an oncologist specializing in advanced cancers.
Obama, on the other hand, was supposedly making sound investments in companies that were economically sound.
Oh, yeah -- and Bain was using money voluntarily invested to fund its efforts, while Obama used tax dollars confiscated from citizens by government under threat of imprisonment. As a result, he had an obligation to get his picks right.
|| Posted by Rhymes With Right, October 31, 2012 09:01 PM ||Post a comment