March 03, 2013

Why Do Liberals Measure Obama By What They Believe To Be The Lowest Available Standard?

One of my guilty pleasures is reading stuff off the Huffington Post. While a lot of their in-house stuff is awful, they do bring together a lot of interesting articles from a variety of sources on topics of interest to me -- especially religion. Reading this interesting article on African/black popes (and I encourage you to read it), I came upon this particularly inappropriate comment from an individual who was clearly trolling.

they'll probably learn from the obama failure. electing someone because of the color of their skin usually isn't a good thing.

Frankly, someone should have flagged it as inappropriate -- such a comment really didn't belong on the article. Instead, someone decided to respond to it.

What "obama failure"? Have you compared how this country is doing compared with 2008? Obama's been a roaring success in comparison. Speaking of voting based on skin color, I wonder how many white folks voted against Obama because of his skin color.

This isn't the first time I've seen this standard used to declare Obama a success -- "He's better than Bush!" But consider what this is really saying. The Left considers Bush to be a nutter failure -- the worst president ever, or at least the worst in the better part of a century (probably not an accurate assessment, but that's irrelevant to what follows). So Obama is a success, they claim, because he is better than what they deem to be utter failure. How low a standard can you set?

If the Left had any respect for Barack Obama and considered him to be a successful president, they wouldn't make George W. Bush the standard. They would instead take the measure of the man by a standard that they consider to be successful -- Bill Clinton, if they want someone recent, FDR if they wanted to use the man deemed to be the most successful Democrat to hold the office. Why not choose one of those presidents? The answer is obvious -- they know Barack Obama doesn't measure up to either of those two Democrat heroes, and any comparison will show him to be (as the original commenter asserts) an utter failure as president. But if they measure Obama against the man they deem to be a failure, they can argue (albeit I'd say not successfully) that Barack Obama has somehow been a success.

So the next time you run into a liberal who wants to telly you that Obama isn't a failure because he has somehow not been as bad as George W. Bush, ask that individual why their standard is so low, and why they don't use a successful president as their yardstick. I'm sure you'll set them stuttering -- until they call you a racist.

|| Greg, 11:43 AM || Permalink || Comments (1) || Comments || TrackBacks (0) ||

Trackback Information for Why Do Liberals Measure Obama By What They Believe To Be The Lowest Available Standard?

TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 'Why Do Liberals Measure Obama By What They Believe To Be The Lowest Available Standard?'.

Comments on Why Do Liberals Measure Obama By What They Believe To Be The Lowest Available Standard?

If Bush was so bad, they shouldn't want to compare of course. Good point.

|| Posted by Sara Noble, March 8, 2013 04:00 PM ||
Post a comment

Remember personal info?




Winner - 2014 Fabulous 50 Blog Awards
Winner - 2014 Fabulous 50 Blog Awards

Winner - 2013 Fabulous 50 Blog Awards

Winner - 2012 Fabulous 50 Blog Awards

Winner - 2011 Fabulous 50 Blog Awards

Winner - 2010 Fabulous 50 Blog Awards

Winner - 2009 Fabulous 50 Blog Awards

Posts by Category

Announcements (posts: 13)
Blogging (posts: 187)
Border Issues & Immigration (posts: 421)
deferred (posts: 4)
Education (posts: 685)
Entertainment & Sports (posts: 483)
Guns & Gun Control (posts: 65)
History (posts: 329)
Humor (posts: 88)
Israel/Middle East (posts: 44)
Medical News (posts: 54)
Military (posts: 273)
News (posts: 1570)
Paid Advertising (posts: 234)
Personal (posts: 108)
Politics (posts: 5261)
Race & Racism (posts: 281)
Religion (posts: 819)
Terrorism (posts: 884)
Texas GOP Platform Reform Project (posts: 4)
The Courts (posts: 310)
Watcher's Council (posts: 482)
World Affairs (posts: 345)


January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
December 0000



Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Powered By

Powered by
Movable Type 2.64

Administrative Stuff

Email Me
Syndicate this site (XML)

Advertising Disclosure


About Me

NAME: Greg
AGE: 50-ish
SEX: Male
OCCUPATION: Social Studies Teacher
LOCATION: Seabrook, TX
DISCLAIMER: All posts reflect my views alone, and not the view of my wife, my dogs, my employer, or anyone else. All comments reflect the view of the commenter, and permitting a comment to remain on this site in no way indicates my support for the ideas expressed in the comment.

Search This Site

Support This Site

Recent Entries

Who Is Regan Theiler And Why Was She Allowed To Spend Public Funds On A Sole Source Contract For Her Part-Time Employer?
Not My Idea Of A Stimulating Evening
About Trump's Liberty University Speech
Do Not Place The Secessionist "Texas Independence" Measure On The 2016 Republican Primary Ballot
Conservatives Vs. Liberal On Those Engaged In Violent Political Activity
Tom Mechler Makes His Case Against Moving The 2016 RPT Convention
Jared Woodfill Makes His Case For Moving The 2016 RPT Convention
Questions About Moving The 2016 RPT Convention
Reject The Call To Move 2016 Republican Party Of Texas Convention
It Is Too Bad That Political Parties Cannot Reject Voters Who Seek To Join, Stop Would-Be Candidates Who Want To Run


Watchers Council
  • Ask Marion
  • Bookworm Room
  • The Colossus of Rhodey
  • The Glittering Eye
  • GrEaT sAtAn"S gIrLfRiEnD
  • The Independent Sentinel
  • JoshuaPundit
  • Liberty's Spirit
  • New Zeal
  • Nice Deb
  • The Noisy Room
  • The Razor
  • Rhymes With Right
  • The Right Planet
  • Simply Jews
  • Virginia Right!
  • Watcher Of Weasels

  • Political & Religious Blogs