Any doubt that we have a partisan hit on Rick Perry? Not only was the indictment based upon the complaint of a Soros-funded liberal activist group, but the grand jury was filled with partisan Democrats.
The Chronicle was able to identify nine of the 12 Travis County residents who served on the grand jury. Of those, five have voted only in Democratic Party primaries over the last 20 years, according to county records. One has voted in both Democratic and Republican primaries during that time, while three have not voted at all.
Having identified 3/4 of the grand jurors, you come up with only one who has EVER voted Republican -- and even then the grand juror is not a consistent GOP primary voter? But you get five who have never voted in any other primary except the Democrat primary? Looks like the grand jury was stacked.
But surely they were fair-minded, right? After all, look at this from one of them.
Rhoda Chambers, who is the only person listed in Travis County with her name but would only confirm her service on a jury that ended last week, said grand juries involve careful consideration of facts.
"For me, it's not a political decision," Chambers said. "That's what a grand jury is about - take the emotion out of it and look at the facts and make your best decision."
Sounds very high minded, doesn't it? Except while she was serving on the grand jury in question, she was involved in some other activity as well.
Rho Chalmers, who disclosed to the Houston Chronicle yesterday that she was a member of the grand jury that indicted Texas Gov. Rick Perry, was an active delegate to the Texas Democratic Party convention during grand jury proceedings. Chalmers’ active participation in Democratic state politics is important because she claimed yesterday to the Houston Chronicle that her decision to indict Perry, a Republican, was not based on politics.
“For me, it’s not a political decision,” Chalmers told the newspaper. “That’s what a grand jury is about – take the emotion out of it and look at the facts and make your best decision based on your life experience.”
More troubling, however, is the fact that Chalmers attended, photographed, and commented on an event with Democratic state Sen. Kirk Watson while grand jury proceedings were ongoing.
Watson was a witness in front of the grand jury. On June 27, 2014, Chalmers shared a photo of the Watson event on a community Facebook page she started called Developer’s Dungeon. “Senator Kirk Watson telling the story of the Wendy Davis fillibuster (sic),” she wrote in a comment accompanying the picture.
While serving on the grand jury charged with hearing no other case except one against the sitting governor involving a conflict with a public official of a different party, she was a delegate to that other party's convention. Not only that, she served on the Rules Committee -- a position that as a rule only goes to the most active of party activists. Not only that, she was having outside contact with witnesses testifying before the grand jury while it was sitting. Doesn't this raise questions as to the impartiality of this grand juror? I would argue that it does -- and that it also raises the question of she may have tainted the grand jury's deliberations.
Frankly, this does not pass the smell test.
The indictment of a sitting governor for using his veto power is on its face a perverse violation of the separation of powers contained in the Texas Constitution. To allow a grand jury stacked with the governor's political opponents is even less acceptable. The judge assigned to hear this case needs to dismiss the charges with prejudice -- and if he does not, then the appellate court needs to do so in order to preserve the principle of separation of powers and that of not criminalizing what are disputes over politics and policy.