June 01, 2015

The Hastert Indictment

About 30 years back, a group of my fellow College Republicans drove to a neighboring Congressional district to campaign for the GOP candidate there – a high school teacher and coach named Dennis Hastert. He went on to become Speaker of the House. And last week he was indicted on some serious charges – none of which I believe should be crimes in the first place. After all, is it really government’s place to monitory when you take money out or put money in the bank, absent some evidence of criminal conduct?

Over at Commentary, John Steele Gordon expresses my feelings quite well.

Dennis Hastert, the former Republican Speaker of the House, was indicted last week on federal charges. First he was indicted for “structuring” bank cash withdrawals so as to evade bank reporting requirements. Federal banking regulations require banks to report cash deposits or withdrawals in excess of $10,000. Second he was indicted for lying to a federal official (an FBI agent) as to the reason for these withdrawals.

Hastert has always had a reputation for being personally squeaky clean, so when the indictment was unsealed and it stated that the money — totaling $1.7 million — had been used as hush money to prevent “past misconduct” with “individual A” from becoming public, it was front-page news around the country. And while the indictment was very carefully gender-neutral, it was very soon leaked that “individual A” was male and had been “inappropriately touched” by Hastert when he had been a high school teacher and wrestling coach decades ago.

There are a lot of questions here. Did a former Speaker of the House really not know that banks report large cash withdrawals to the feds and that evading those reporting requirements is a crime? Did he not know that lying to federal agents is also a crime? That strains credulity. On the other hand, the bank reporting requirements are intended to prevent, or at least deter, such serious crimes as money laundering, racketeering, drug dealing, and tax evasion. Paying hush money is not a crime. (Blackmailing someone, however, most certainly is, but at the state level. Is Illinois looking into the conduct of “individual A”? And did he pay taxes on the money he “earned” in this affair? And while lying to a federal official is also against the law, there was no underlying crime to be investigated here. Hastert was desperately trying to preserve his reputation, not evade justice.

It may shock people, but it looks like Hastert is being prosecuted because he tried to pay off a blackmailer. Paying a blackmailer is no crime – but engaging in such extortion is a crime. As such, what we have going on here is the victim of a crime being prosecuted. Will the state of Illinois look into prosecuting the blackmailer for committing extortion? Will the DoJ do so if it becomes clear that the extortion effort made use of the US mail or interstate electronic communications? After all, those are much more serious crimes, and are crimes even if (and it is a big if, given the lack of any details) Hastert did in fact engage in some sort of sexual misconduct with one of his students thirty or more years ago.

And let me make three things very clear about the alleged sexual impropriety on Hastert’s part. First, if it is true, then I unambiguously condemn the abuse, something which I have consistently declared to be a great evil since the earliest days of this blog. Second, if the accusation is true, then the alleged victim should have contacted law enforcement and used the legal system to seek financial compensation. Third, I understand Hastert’s willingness to pay even if the charges are false – I’ve seen men I considered friends, colleagues, or mentors (both priests and teachers) have their lives and careers destroyed by the taint of false accusations.

|| Greg, 02:32 PM || Permalink || Comments (1) || Comments || TrackBacks (0) ||

Trackback Information for The Hastert Indictment

TrackBack URL for this entry:
Listed below are links to weblogs that reference 'The Hastert Indictment'.

Comments on The Hastert Indictment

Not picking on any particular star, but this comes to mind:

A few years ago, Celine Dion gave an interview wherein she told of how a woman got together with her husband, and later threatened to (falsely) accuse him of rape if they did not pay her off.

They did pay her off - and she later came back for more.

Celine and her husband then contacted the police.

NO ONE called for Celine's husband to be prosecuted, or for Celine or her husband to brought up on charges for "improper banking".

This is pure political bullsh!t.

|| Posted by Steven, June 4, 2015 05:50 PM ||
Post a comment

Remember personal info?




Winner - 2014 Fabulous 50 Blog Awards
Winner - 2014 Fabulous 50 Blog Awards

Winner - 2013 Fabulous 50 Blog Awards

Winner - 2012 Fabulous 50 Blog Awards

Winner - 2011 Fabulous 50 Blog Awards

Winner - 2010 Fabulous 50 Blog Awards

Winner - 2009 Fabulous 50 Blog Awards

Posts by Category

Abortion (posts: 1)
Announcements (posts: 13)
Blogging (posts: 187)
Border Issues & Immigration (posts: 421)
deferred (posts: 4)
Education (posts: 685)
Entertainment & Sports (posts: 483)
Guns & Gun Control (posts: 65)
History (posts: 329)
Humor (posts: 88)
Israel/Middle East (posts: 44)
Medical News (posts: 54)
Military (posts: 273)
News (posts: 1570)
Paid Advertising (posts: 234)
Personal (posts: 108)
Politics (posts: 5263)
Race & Racism (posts: 281)
Religion (posts: 819)
Terrorism (posts: 884)
Texas GOP Platform Reform Project (posts: 4)
The Courts (posts: 310)
Watcher's Council (posts: 482)
World Affairs (posts: 345)


February 2016
January 2016
December 2015
November 2015
September 2015
August 2015
July 2015
June 2015
May 2015
April 2015
March 2015
February 2015
January 2015
December 2014
November 2014
October 2014
September 2014
August 2014
July 2014
June 2014
May 2014
April 2014
March 2014
February 2014
January 2014
December 2013
November 2013
October 2013
September 2013
August 2013
July 2013
June 2013
May 2013
April 2013
March 2013
February 2013
January 2013
December 2012
November 2012
October 2012
September 2012
August 2012
July 2012
June 2012
May 2012
April 2012
March 2012
February 2012
January 2012
December 2011
November 2011
October 2011
September 2011
August 2011
July 2011
June 2011
May 2011
April 2011
March 2011
February 2011
January 2011
December 2010
November 2010
October 2010
September 2010
August 2010
July 2010
June 2010
May 2010
April 2010
March 2010
February 2010
January 2010
December 2009
November 2009
October 2009
September 2009
August 2009
July 2009
June 2009
May 2009
April 2009
March 2009
February 2009
January 2009
December 2008
November 2008
October 2008
September 2008
August 2008
July 2008
June 2008
May 2008
April 2008
March 2008
February 2008
January 2008
December 2007
November 2007
October 2007
September 2007
August 2007
July 2007
June 2007
May 2007
April 2007
March 2007
February 2007
January 2007
December 2006
November 2006
October 2006
September 2006
August 2006
July 2006
June 2006
May 2006
April 2006
March 2006
February 2006
January 2006
December 2005
November 2005
October 2005
September 2005
August 2005
July 2005
June 2005
May 2005
April 2005
March 2005
February 2005
January 2005
December 2004
November 2004
October 2004
September 2004
August 2004
July 2004
June 2004
December 0000



Creative Commons License
This weblog is licensed under a Creative Commons License.

Powered By

Powered by
Movable Type 2.64

Administrative Stuff

Email Me
Syndicate this site (XML)

Advertising Disclosure


About Me

NAME: Greg
AGE: 50-ish
SEX: Male
OCCUPATION: Social Studies Teacher
LOCATION: Seabrook, TX
DISCLAIMER: All posts reflect my views alone, and not the view of my wife, my dogs, my employer, or anyone else. All comments reflect the view of the commenter, and permitting a comment to remain on this site in no way indicates my support for the ideas expressed in the comment.

Search This Site

Support This Site

Recent Entries

Republican Primary Endorsements -- 2016
A Proposed Shorter RPT Platform
Pro-Lifers To Release Documents Related To Purchase Of Fetal Tissue By Texas Public Universities!
Who Is Regan Theiler And Why Was She Allowed To Spend Public Funds On A Sole Source Contract For Her Part-Time Employer?
Not My Idea Of A Stimulating Evening
About Trump's Liberty University Speech
Do Not Place The Secessionist "Texas Independence" Measure On The 2016 Republican Primary Ballot
Conservatives Vs. Liberal On Those Engaged In Violent Political Activity
Tom Mechler Makes His Case Against Moving The 2016 RPT Convention
Jared Woodfill Makes His Case For Moving The 2016 RPT Convention


Watchers Council
  • Ask Marion
  • Bookworm Room
  • The Colossus of Rhodey
  • The Glittering Eye
  • GrEaT sAtAn"S gIrLfRiEnD
  • The Independent Sentinel
  • JoshuaPundit
  • Liberty's Spirit
  • New Zeal
  • Nice Deb
  • The Noisy Room
  • The Razor
  • Rhymes With Right
  • The Right Planet
  • Simply Jews
  • Virginia Right!
  • Watcher Of Weasels

  • Political & Religious Blogs